TY - JOUR
T1 - Achieving sustainability in urology
T2 - a consensus study by the European association of urology (EAU) section office
AU - Tozsin, Atınç
AU - Ahmed, Kamran
AU - Soytürk, Selim
AU - Pradere, Benjamin
AU - Dasgupta, Prokar
AU - Sönmez, Mehmet Giray
AU - Keller, Etienne Xavier
AU - Omar, Muhammad Imran
AU - Mallet, Richard
AU - Aydın, Abdullatif
AU - Gadzhiev, Nariman
AU - Çakır, Ömer Onur
AU - Vasquez, Juan Luis
AU - Akgül, Burak
AU - Arslan, Erkan
AU - Sılay, Selçuk Mesrur
AU - Sanguedolce, Francesco
AU - Roupret, Morgan
AU - Musquera, Mireia
AU - Ralph, David
AU - Colecchia, Maurizio
AU - Finazzi Agro, Enrico
AU - Bettocchi, Carlo
AU - Traxer, Olivier
AU - Tunç, Lütfi
AU - Rassweiler, Jens
AU - Herrmann, Thomas R W
AU - Knoll, Thomas
AU - Güven, Selçuk
N1 - © 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - PURPOSE: To assess the awareness, attitudes, and practices related to environmental sustainability among urologists and to explore targeted interventions, educational initiatives to enhance sustainability in urological practice while maintaining high standards of patient care.METHODS: A focus group defined objectives and methodology. Ethical approval was obtained (NEU IRB: 22425), and the study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06723574). A two-stage approach was adopted: a cross-sectional survey among EAU Section Office and Working Group members to assess sustainability awareness and practices; followed by a single-round structured consensus statement to validate key findings and inform practical recommendations. While referred to as a 'consensus statement' in this manuscript, this process did not follow formal Delphi or multi-round consensus methodology.RESULTS: A total of 83 out of 390 participants completed the first step survey (21.3% response rate), and 26 of 32 individuals responded to the consensus statement (81.3% response rate). The environmental awareness was reported as 61.5%, with 49.3% considering sustainability in instrument use. Respondents showed importance on implementing environmentally sustainable practices in the operating room, with 83.2% agreement rate. This study's limitations include a restricted sample of participants, potential exclusion of early-career perspectives, single-round consensus limiting depth, and survey length possibly inducing fatigue. Broader, multi-phase research is recommended.CONCLUSION: Sustainability in urology appears to be increasingly recognized as an important aspect of high-quality care. Respondents in this cohort emphasized priorities such as improving waste management, adopting reusable instruments where feasible, and incorporating sustainability training into medical education.
AB - PURPOSE: To assess the awareness, attitudes, and practices related to environmental sustainability among urologists and to explore targeted interventions, educational initiatives to enhance sustainability in urological practice while maintaining high standards of patient care.METHODS: A focus group defined objectives and methodology. Ethical approval was obtained (NEU IRB: 22425), and the study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06723574). A two-stage approach was adopted: a cross-sectional survey among EAU Section Office and Working Group members to assess sustainability awareness and practices; followed by a single-round structured consensus statement to validate key findings and inform practical recommendations. While referred to as a 'consensus statement' in this manuscript, this process did not follow formal Delphi or multi-round consensus methodology.RESULTS: A total of 83 out of 390 participants completed the first step survey (21.3% response rate), and 26 of 32 individuals responded to the consensus statement (81.3% response rate). The environmental awareness was reported as 61.5%, with 49.3% considering sustainability in instrument use. Respondents showed importance on implementing environmentally sustainable practices in the operating room, with 83.2% agreement rate. This study's limitations include a restricted sample of participants, potential exclusion of early-career perspectives, single-round consensus limiting depth, and survey length possibly inducing fatigue. Broader, multi-phase research is recommended.CONCLUSION: Sustainability in urology appears to be increasingly recognized as an important aspect of high-quality care. Respondents in this cohort emphasized priorities such as improving waste management, adopting reusable instruments where feasible, and incorporating sustainability training into medical education.
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Consensus
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Europe
KW - Focus Groups
KW - Societies, Medical
KW - Urology
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-025-06084-4
DO - 10.1007/s00345-025-06084-4
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41240108
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 43
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 1
M1 - 697
ER -