TY - JOUR
T1 - An ecological perspective for understanding regional integration based on ecosystem service budgets, bundles, and flows
T2 - A case study of the Jinan metropolitan area in China
AU - Li, Kai
AU - Hou, Ying
AU - Andersen, Peter Stubkjær
AU - Xin, Ruhong
AU - Rong, Yuejing
AU - Skov-Petersen, Hans
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Regional integration can contribute to co-occurring benefits of different parts of an urban agglomeration by managing these parts as a whole. However, current regional integration mainly focuses on the socioeconomic rather than the ecological dimension. To interpret regional ecological integration, we firstly selected six typical ecosystem services (ESs) to represent ecological benefits that potentially need to be improved by ecological integration for further analysis. Then we used ES budgets, bundles, and flows to investigate the potential, basic analysis unit, and occurring manners of ecological integration, respectively. Our results show that supply-demand mismatches were observed in all the ES types. Meanwhile, coexisting ES surpluses and deficits on the town scale were found in supporting biodiversity, soil retention, water yield, green space recreation, and crop yield, which indicates that their supply-demand mismatches can be mitigated with ecological integration. Furthermore, all the towns were classified into five spatial clusters with distinct ES budget bundles, which acted as the basic analysis unit of ecological integration. ES flows with three flow characteristic types were observed between different clusters, and all the clusters had ES provider-beneficiary relationships with each other. Based on the ES approach, we provided an ecological perspective for understanding regional integration, which has the potential to promote regional ecological sustainability.
AB - Regional integration can contribute to co-occurring benefits of different parts of an urban agglomeration by managing these parts as a whole. However, current regional integration mainly focuses on the socioeconomic rather than the ecological dimension. To interpret regional ecological integration, we firstly selected six typical ecosystem services (ESs) to represent ecological benefits that potentially need to be improved by ecological integration for further analysis. Then we used ES budgets, bundles, and flows to investigate the potential, basic analysis unit, and occurring manners of ecological integration, respectively. Our results show that supply-demand mismatches were observed in all the ES types. Meanwhile, coexisting ES surpluses and deficits on the town scale were found in supporting biodiversity, soil retention, water yield, green space recreation, and crop yield, which indicates that their supply-demand mismatches can be mitigated with ecological integration. Furthermore, all the towns were classified into five spatial clusters with distinct ES budget bundles, which acted as the basic analysis unit of ecological integration. ES flows with three flow characteristic types were observed between different clusters, and all the clusters had ES provider-beneficiary relationships with each other. Based on the ES approach, we provided an ecological perspective for understanding regional integration, which has the potential to promote regional ecological sustainability.
KW - Ecosystem service
KW - Ecosystem service bundle
KW - Regional development
KW - Spatial cluster
KW - Supply-demand
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114371
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114371
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34953229
AN - SCOPUS:85121720599
VL - 305
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
SN - 0301-4797
M1 - 114371
ER -