An Evaluation of the Physicochemical Properties of Preservative-Free 0.005% (w/v) Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solutions, and the Impact on In Vitro Human Conjunctival Goblet Cell Survival

Josefine C. Freiberg, Anne Hedengran, Steffen Heegaard, Goran Petrovski, Jette Jacobsen, Barbara Cvenkel, Miriam Kolko*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the physicochemical properties of five preservative-free (PF) 0.005% latanoprost ophthalmic products; Monoprost®, Latanest®, Gaap Ofteno®, Xalmono®, and Xaloptic® Free. Furthermore, the study investigated the mucin production and cell survival of primary cultured human conjunctival goblet cells when treated with PF eye drops. Method: The pH value, osmolality, and surface tension were examined. Cell survival was analyzed using lactate dehydrogenase and tetrazolium dye colorimetric assays. Mucin production was analyzed with immunohistochemical staining. Results: Monoprost® (pH value 6.84 ± 0.032) had a pH value closest to the pH value of tear fluid (pH value 7.4–7.6), whereas Gaap Ofteno® (pH value 6.34 ± 0.004) and Latanest® (pH value 6.33 ± 0.003) had the lowest pH values. Gaap Ofteno® (325.9 ± 2.9 mosmol/kg) showed iso-osmolar probabilities, whereas the other products were hypo-osmolar. Gaap Ofteno® (60.31 ± 0.35 mN/m) had a higher surface tension compared to the tear fluid (40 to 46 mN/m), as described in the literature. No significant differences in goblet cell survival or mucin release were observed between the treatments and control. Conclusion: Significant differences in pH value, osmolality, and surface tension were observed. However, this did not affect the viability of the goblet cells or the release of mucin. Clinical studies are required to evaluate the long-term effects of use on efficacy and safety.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3137
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume11
Issue number11
ISSN2077-0383
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: Special thanks to laboratory technician Charlotte Taul for her laboratory assistance. We acknowledge the Hørslev-Fonden for their equipment grant for a tensiometer. We also acknowledge the Vissing-Fonden for their project support grant to meet the running costs. The study at the Center for Eye Research, Oslo, Norway, was partially supported by funding from the Norwegian Association of the Blind and Partially Sighted.

Funding Information:
Funding: This research was funded by Laboratoires Théa (France).

Keywords

  • cell viability
  • goblet cells
  • latanoprost
  • osmolality
  • pH value
  • preservative-free (PF)
  • surface tension
  • tear film

Cite this