TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical evaluation of a multiplex PCR-based test for joint infection
T2 - a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of forty-nine patients
AU - Lund-Andersen, Jacob
AU - Petersen, Matilde L. H.
AU - Kostadinov, Krassimir
AU - Friis-Hansen, Lennart
AU - Calum, Henrik
AU - Overgaard, Søren
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)) of the PCR-based BioFire® Joint Infection Panel (BJI Panel) against microbiological culture growth for patients suspected of having a native or prosthetic joint infection. Methods: Synovial fluid and tissue biopsies were prospectively collected from patients from June 2022 to June 2023. The results of the BJI Panel were compared with those of culture growth. Results: 51 samples were included. Including all pathogens, the sensitivity was 69%, the specificity 89%, the PPV 73% and the NPV 86%. Including only pathogens in the BJI Panel, the sensitivity was 100%, the specificity 90%, the PPV 73% and the NPV 100%. Conclusion: The BJI Panel has a high accuracy for detecting the pathogens in its panel, but the absence of important common pathogens from the panel reduces its sensitivity and NPV. With a short turnaround time and precise pathogen detection, the BJI Panel has the potential to add value as a complementary diagnostic method.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)) of the PCR-based BioFire® Joint Infection Panel (BJI Panel) against microbiological culture growth for patients suspected of having a native or prosthetic joint infection. Methods: Synovial fluid and tissue biopsies were prospectively collected from patients from June 2022 to June 2023. The results of the BJI Panel were compared with those of culture growth. Results: 51 samples were included. Including all pathogens, the sensitivity was 69%, the specificity 89%, the PPV 73% and the NPV 86%. Including only pathogens in the BJI Panel, the sensitivity was 100%, the specificity 90%, the PPV 73% and the NPV 100%. Conclusion: The BJI Panel has a high accuracy for detecting the pathogens in its panel, but the absence of important common pathogens from the panel reduces its sensitivity and NPV. With a short turnaround time and precise pathogen detection, the BJI Panel has the potential to add value as a complementary diagnostic method.
KW - Culture growth
KW - Diagnostic accuracy
KW - Joint infection
KW - Pathogen detection
KW - PCR
U2 - 10.1007/s00590-024-04114-2
DO - 10.1007/s00590-024-04114-2
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39358640
AN - SCOPUS:85205419237
VL - 34
SP - 4105
EP - 4111
JO - European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
JF - European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
SN - 1633-8065
IS - 8
ER -