TY - JOUR
T1 - Complexity of avian evolution revealed by family-level genomes
AU - Stiller, Josefin
AU - Feng, Shaohong
AU - Chowdhury, Al-Aabid
AU - Rivas-González, Iker
AU - Duchêne, David A.
AU - Fang, Qi
AU - Deng, Yuan
AU - Kozlov, Alexey
AU - Stamatakis, Alexandros
AU - Claramunt, Santiago
AU - Nguyen, Jacqueline M. T.
AU - Ho, Simon Y. W.
AU - Faircloth, Brant C.
AU - Haag, Julia
AU - Houde, Peter
AU - Cracraft, Joel
AU - Balaban, Metin
AU - Mai, Uyen
AU - Chen, Guangji
AU - Gao, Rongsheng
AU - Zhou, Chengran
AU - Xie, Yulong
AU - Huang, Zijian
AU - Cao, Zhen
AU - Yan, Zhi
AU - Ogilvie, Huw A.
AU - Nakhleh, Luay
AU - Lindow, Bent
AU - Morel, Benoit
AU - Fjeldså, Jon
AU - Hosner, Peter A.
AU - da Fonseca, Rute R.
AU - Petersen, Bent
AU - Tobias, Joseph A.
AU - Székely, Tamás
AU - Kennedy, Jonathan David
AU - Hart Reeve, Andrew
AU - Liker, Andras
AU - Stervander, Martin
AU - Antunes, Agostinho
AU - Tietze, Dieter Thomas
AU - Bertelsen, Mads F.
AU - Lei, Fumin
AU - Rahbek, Carsten
AU - Graves, Gary R.
AU - Schierup, Mikkel H.
AU - Warnow, Tandy
AU - Braun, Edward L.
AU - Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
AU - Jarvis, Erich D.
AU - Mirarab, Siavash
AU - Zhang, Guojie
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Despite tremendous efforts in the past decades, relationships among main avian lineages remain heavily debated without a clear resolution. Discrepancies have been attributed to diversity of species sampled, phylogenetic method, and the choice of genomic regions 1–3. Here, we address these issues by analyzing genomes of 363 bird species 4 (218 taxonomic families, 92% of total). Using intergenic regions and coalescent methods, we present a well-supported tree but also a remarkable degree of discordance. The tree confirms that Neoaves experienced rapid radiation at or near the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary. Sufficient loci rather than extensive taxon sampling were more effective in resolving difficult nodes. Remaining recalcitrant nodes involve species that challenge modeling due to extreme GC content, variable substitution rates, incomplete lineage sorting, or complex evolutionary events such as ancient hybridization. Assessment of the impacts of different genomic partitions showed high heterogeneity across the genome. We discovered sharp increases in effective population size, substitution rates, and relative brain size following the K–Pg extinction event, supporting the hypothesis that emerging ecological opportunities catalyzed the diversification of modern birds. The resulting phylogenetic estimate offers novel insights into the rapid radiation of modern birds and provides a taxon-rich backbone tree for future comparative studies.
AB - Despite tremendous efforts in the past decades, relationships among main avian lineages remain heavily debated without a clear resolution. Discrepancies have been attributed to diversity of species sampled, phylogenetic method, and the choice of genomic regions 1–3. Here, we address these issues by analyzing genomes of 363 bird species 4 (218 taxonomic families, 92% of total). Using intergenic regions and coalescent methods, we present a well-supported tree but also a remarkable degree of discordance. The tree confirms that Neoaves experienced rapid radiation at or near the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary. Sufficient loci rather than extensive taxon sampling were more effective in resolving difficult nodes. Remaining recalcitrant nodes involve species that challenge modeling due to extreme GC content, variable substitution rates, incomplete lineage sorting, or complex evolutionary events such as ancient hybridization. Assessment of the impacts of different genomic partitions showed high heterogeneity across the genome. We discovered sharp increases in effective population size, substitution rates, and relative brain size following the K–Pg extinction event, supporting the hypothesis that emerging ecological opportunities catalyzed the diversification of modern birds. The resulting phylogenetic estimate offers novel insights into the rapid radiation of modern birds and provides a taxon-rich backbone tree for future comparative studies.
U2 - 10.1038/s41586-024-07323-1
DO - 10.1038/s41586-024-07323-1
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38560995
VL - 629
SP - 851
EP - 860
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
SN - 0028-0836
ER -