TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to primary care for influenza-like-illness
T2 - economic evaluation alongside the randomised controlled ALIC4E trial in 15 European countries
AU - Li, Xiao
AU - Bilcke, Joke
AU - van der Velden, Alike W.
AU - Bruyndonckx, Robin
AU - Coenen, Samuel
AU - Bongard, Emily
AU - de Paor, Muirrean
AU - Chlabicz, Slawomir
AU - Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
AU - Francis, Nick
AU - Aabenhus, Rune
AU - Bucher, Heiner C.
AU - Colliers, Annelies
AU - De Sutter, An
AU - Garcia-Sangenis, Ana
AU - Glinz, Dominik
AU - Harbin, Nicolay J.
AU - Kosiek, Katarzyna
AU - Lindbaek, Morten
AU - Lionis, Christos
AU - Llor, Carl
AU - Miko-Pauer, Reka
AU - Jurgute, Ruta Radzeviciene
AU - Seifert, Bohumil
AU - Sundvall, Par-Daniel
AU - Lundgren, Pia Touboul
AU - Tsakountakis, Nikolaos
AU - Verheij, Theo J.
AU - Goossens, Herman
AU - Butler, Christopher C.
AU - Beutels, Philippe
AU - ALIC4Etrial Investigators
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background Oseltamivir is usually not often prescribed (or reimbursed) for non-high-risk patients consulting for influenza-like-illness (ILI) in primary care in Europe. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to usual primary care in adults/adolescents (13 years +) and children with ILI during seasonal influenza epidemics, using data collected in an open-label, multi-season, randomised controlled trial of oseltamivir in 15 European countries. Methods Direct and indirect cost estimates were based on patient reported resource use and official country-specific unit costs. Health-Related Quality of Life was assessed by EQ-5D questionnaires. Costs and quality adjusted life-years (QALY) were bootstrapped (N = 10,000) to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), from both the healthcare payers' and the societal perspectives, with uncertainty expressed through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and expected value for perfect information (EVPI) analysis. Additionally, scenario (self-reported spending), comorbidities subgroup and country-specific analyses were performed. Results The healthcare payers' expected ICERs of oseltamivir were euro22,459 per QALY gained in adults/adolescents and euro13,001 in children. From the societal perspective, oseltamivir was cost-saving in adults/adolescents, but the ICER is euro8,344 in children. Large uncertainties were observed in subgroups with comorbidities, especially for children. The expected ICERs and extent of decision uncertainty varied between countries (EVPI ranged euro1-euro35 per patient). Conclusion Adding oseltamivir to primary usual care in Europe is likely to be cost-effective for treating adults/adolescents and children with ILI from the healthcare payers' perspective (if willingness-to-pay per QALY gained > euro22,459) and cost-saving in adults/adolescents from a societal perspective.
AB - Background Oseltamivir is usually not often prescribed (or reimbursed) for non-high-risk patients consulting for influenza-like-illness (ILI) in primary care in Europe. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to usual primary care in adults/adolescents (13 years +) and children with ILI during seasonal influenza epidemics, using data collected in an open-label, multi-season, randomised controlled trial of oseltamivir in 15 European countries. Methods Direct and indirect cost estimates were based on patient reported resource use and official country-specific unit costs. Health-Related Quality of Life was assessed by EQ-5D questionnaires. Costs and quality adjusted life-years (QALY) were bootstrapped (N = 10,000) to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), from both the healthcare payers' and the societal perspectives, with uncertainty expressed through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and expected value for perfect information (EVPI) analysis. Additionally, scenario (self-reported spending), comorbidities subgroup and country-specific analyses were performed. Results The healthcare payers' expected ICERs of oseltamivir were euro22,459 per QALY gained in adults/adolescents and euro13,001 in children. From the societal perspective, oseltamivir was cost-saving in adults/adolescents, but the ICER is euro8,344 in children. Large uncertainties were observed in subgroups with comorbidities, especially for children. The expected ICERs and extent of decision uncertainty varied between countries (EVPI ranged euro1-euro35 per patient). Conclusion Adding oseltamivir to primary usual care in Europe is likely to be cost-effective for treating adults/adolescents and children with ILI from the healthcare payers' perspective (if willingness-to-pay per QALY gained > euro22,459) and cost-saving in adults/adolescents from a societal perspective.
KW - Tamiflu
KW - Cost-utility analysis
KW - Europe
KW - Multi-country
KW - QALY
KW - ILI
KW - Direct cost
KW - Indirect cost
KW - Productivity losses
KW - ADULTS
KW - METAANALYSIS
U2 - 10.1007/s10198-022-01521-2
DO - 10.1007/s10198-022-01521-2
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36131214
VL - 24
JO - European Journal of Health Economics
JF - European Journal of Health Economics
SN - 1618-7598
ER -