Daily remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Insights from the pooled patient-level data from three randomized controlled trials (IN-TIME, ECOST, TRUST)

Gerhard Hindricks*, Niraj Varma, Salem Kacet, Thorsten Lewalter, Peter Søgaard, Laurence Guédon-Moreau, Jochen Proff, Thomas A. Gerds, Stefan D. Anker, Christian Torp-Pedersen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

122 Citations (Scopus)
340 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators may improve clinical outcome. A recent meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials (TRUST, ECOST, IN-TIME) using a specific remote monitoring system with daily transmissions [Biotronik Home Monitoring (HM)] demonstrated improved survival. We performed a patient-level analysis to verify this result with appropriate time-to-event statistics and to investigate further clinical endpoints.

Methods and results: Individual data of the TRUST, ECOST, and IN-TIME patients were pooled to calculate absolute risks of endpoints at 1-year follow-up for HM vs. conventional follow-up. All-cause mortality analysis involved all three trials (2405 patients). Other endpoints involved two trials, ECOST and IN-TIME (1078 patients), in which an independent blinded endpoint committee adjudicated the underlying causes of hospitalizations and deaths. The absolute risk of death at 1 year was reduced by 1.9% in the HM group (95% CI: 0.1-3.8%; P = 0.037), equivalent to a risk ratio of 0.62. Also the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for worsening heart failure (WHF) was significantly reduced (by 5.6%; P = 0.007; risk ratio 0.64). The composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization tended to be reduced by a similar degree (4.1%; P = 0.13; risk ratio 0.85) but without statistical significance.

Conclusion: In a pooled analysis of the three trials, HM reduced all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or WHF hospitalization. The similar magnitudes of absolute risk reductions for WHF and CV endpoints suggest that the benefit of HM is driven by the prevention of heart failure exacerbation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume38
Issue number22
Pages (from-to)1749-1755
Number of pages7
ISSN0195-668X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Death
  • Heart failure
  • Hospitalization
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Meta-analysis
  • Remote monitoring

Cite this