TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences in biomarker levels and proteomic survival prediction across two COVID-19 cohorts with distinct treatments
AU - Hansen, Cecilie Bo
AU - Møller, Maria Elizabeth Engel
AU - Pérez-Alós, Laura
AU - Israelsen, Simone Bastrup
AU - Drici, Lylia
AU - Ottenheijm, Maud Eline
AU - Nielsen, Annelaura Bach
AU - Wewer Albrechtsen, Nicolai J.
AU - Benfield, Thomas
AU - Garred, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Prognostic biomarkers have been widely studied in COVID-19, but their levels may be influenced by treatment strategies. This study examined plasma biomarkers and proteomic survival prediction in two unvaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 cohorts receiving different treatments. In a derivation cohort (n = 126) from early 2020, we performed plasma proteomic profiling and evaluated innate and complement system immune markers. A proteomic model based on differentially expressed proteins predicted 30-day mortality with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81. The model was tested in a validation cohort (n = 80) from late 2020, where patients received remdesivir and dexamethasone, and performed with an AUC of 0.75. Biomarker levels varied considerably between cohorts, sometimes in opposite directions, highlighting the impact of treatment regimens on biomarker expression. These findings underscore the need to account for treatment effects when developing prognostic models, as treatment differences may limit their generalizability across populations.
AB - Prognostic biomarkers have been widely studied in COVID-19, but their levels may be influenced by treatment strategies. This study examined plasma biomarkers and proteomic survival prediction in two unvaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 cohorts receiving different treatments. In a derivation cohort (n = 126) from early 2020, we performed plasma proteomic profiling and evaluated innate and complement system immune markers. A proteomic model based on differentially expressed proteins predicted 30-day mortality with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81. The model was tested in a validation cohort (n = 80) from late 2020, where patients received remdesivir and dexamethasone, and performed with an AUC of 0.75. Biomarker levels varied considerably between cohorts, sometimes in opposite directions, highlighting the impact of treatment regimens on biomarker expression. These findings underscore the need to account for treatment effects when developing prognostic models, as treatment differences may limit their generalizability across populations.
KW - Immunology
KW - Proteomics
U2 - 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112046
DO - 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112046
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85219513408
SN - 2589-0042
VL - 28
JO - iScience
JF - iScience
IS - 3
M1 - 112046
ER -