Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Early detection and intervention in first-episode schizophrenia: a critical review

Tor Ketil Larsen, Svein Friis, U Haahr, I Joa, Jan Olav Johannessen, I Melle, S Opjordsmoen, Erik Simonsen, P Vaglum

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

191 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on early intervention in psychosis and to evaluate relevant studies.

METHOD: Early intervention was defined as intervention in the prodromal phase (primary prevention) and intervention after the onset of psychosis, i.e. shortening of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) (secondary prevention).

RESULTS: We found few studies aimed at early intervention, but many papers discussing the idea at a more general level. We identified no studies that prove that intervention in the prodromal phase is possible without a high risk for treating false positives. We identified some studies aimed at reducing DUP, but the results are ambiguous and, until now, no follow-up data showing a positive effect on prognosis have been presented.

CONCLUSION: Early intervention in psychosis is a difficult and important challenge for the psychiatric health services. At the time being reduction of DUP seems to be the most promising strategy. Intervention in the prodromal phase is more ethically and conceptually problematic.

Original languageEnglish
Book seriesActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum
Volume103
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)323-34
Number of pages12
ISSN0001-690X
Publication statusPublished - May 2001

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Psychotic Disorders
  • Schizophrenia
  • Schizophrenic Psychology
  • Time Factors
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

Cite this