Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine and betadine antiseptic eye drops on cultured human conjunctival goblet cell survival

Rubin Hadad, Anne Hedengran, Alex Barnils, Goran Petrovski, Barbara Cvenkel, Tor P. Utheim, Darlene A. Dartt, Steffen Heegaard, Miriam Kolko*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effect of the ocular antiseptic treatments 0.05% chlorhexidine, 5% povidone-iodine (PI) and 5% betadine on cell viability and mucin secretion of primary cultured human goblet cells (GCs). Method: GC viability was analysed using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and tetrazolium dye (MTT) colorimetric assays. Expression of mucin was visualised by immunohistochemical MUC5AC staining. Results: PI and betadine significantly reduced GC survival compared to the control (mean cell survival 23 ± 6% and 23 ± 7%, respectively, p < 0.05), whereas chlorhexidine did not significantly affect GC viability (mean cell survival: 78 ± 17%), as measured by the LDH assay. Similar results were obtained from the MTT assay, where PI and betadine caused a significant loss of GCs (mean cell survival: 26 ± 12% and 26 ± 13%, respectively, p < 0.05). Chlorhexidine did not significantly alter GC survival compared to the control (mean cell survival: 79 ± 8%). PI and betadine caused a dispersion of mucin secretion, which chlorhexidine did not. Conclusion: The most used antiseptic treatments, PI and betadine, applied prior to ocular surgery are significantly more cytotoxic to conjunctival GCs than chlorhexidine treatment.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Ophthalmologica
Volume102
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)773-778
ISSN1755-375X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • betadine
  • chlorhexidine
  • goblet cells
  • ocular surface
  • povidone-iodine

Cite this