Effect of nonindependent substitution on phylogenetic accuracy

John P. Huelsenbeck, Rasmus Nielsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All current phylogenetic methods assume that DNA substitutions are independent among sites. However, ample empirical evidence suggests that the process of substitution is not independent but is, in fact, temporally and spatially correlated. The robustness of several commonly used phylogenetic methods to the assumption of independent substitution is examined. A compound Poisson process is used to model DNA substitution. This model assumes that substitution events are Poisson-distributed in time and that the number of substitutions associated with each event is geometrically distributed. The asymptotic properties of phylogenetic methods do not appear to change under a compound Poisson process of DNA substitution. Moreover, the rank order of the performance of different methods does not change. However, all phylogenetic methods become less efficient when substitution follows a compound Poisson process.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSystematic Biology
Volume48
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)317-328
Number of pages12
ISSN1063-5157
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Compound Poisson process
  • Nonindependent substitution
  • Phylogenetic accuracy

Cite this