TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental, economic, and social sustainability in aquaculture
T2 - the aquaculture performance indicators
AU - Garlock, Taryn M.
AU - Asche, Frank
AU - Anderson, James L.
AU - Eggert, Håkan
AU - Anderson, Thomas M.
AU - Che, Bin
AU - Chávez, Carlos A.
AU - Chu, Jingjie
AU - Chukwuone, Nnaemeka
AU - Dey, Madan M.
AU - Fitzsimmons, Kevin
AU - Flores, Jimely
AU - Guillen, Jordi
AU - Kumar, Ganesh
AU - Liu, Lijun
AU - Llorente, Ignacio
AU - Nguyen, Ly
AU - Nielsen, Rasmus
AU - Pincinato, Ruth B.M.
AU - Sudhakaran, Pratheesh O.
AU - Tibesigwa, Byela
AU - Tveteras, Ragnar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Aquaculture is a rapidly growing food production technology, but there are significant concerns related to its environmental impact and adverse social effects. We examine aquaculture outcomes in a three pillars of sustainability framework by analyzing data collected using the Aquaculture Performance Indicators. Using this approach, comparable data has been collected for 57 aquaculture systems worldwide on 88 metrics that measure social, economic, or environmental outcomes. We first examine the relationships among the three pillars of sustainability and then analyze performance in the three pillars by technology and species. The results show that economic, social, and environmental outcomes are, on average, mutually reinforced in global aquaculture systems. However, the analysis also shows significant variation in the degree of sustainability in different aquaculture systems, and weak performance of some production systems in some dimensions provides opportunity for innovative policy measures and investment to further align sustainability objectives.
AB - Aquaculture is a rapidly growing food production technology, but there are significant concerns related to its environmental impact and adverse social effects. We examine aquaculture outcomes in a three pillars of sustainability framework by analyzing data collected using the Aquaculture Performance Indicators. Using this approach, comparable data has been collected for 57 aquaculture systems worldwide on 88 metrics that measure social, economic, or environmental outcomes. We first examine the relationships among the three pillars of sustainability and then analyze performance in the three pillars by technology and species. The results show that economic, social, and environmental outcomes are, on average, mutually reinforced in global aquaculture systems. However, the analysis also shows significant variation in the degree of sustainability in different aquaculture systems, and weak performance of some production systems in some dimensions provides opportunity for innovative policy measures and investment to further align sustainability objectives.
U2 - 10.1038/s41467-024-49556-8
DO - 10.1038/s41467-024-49556-8
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38902254
AN - SCOPUS:85196424483
VL - 15
JO - Nature Communications
JF - Nature Communications
SN - 2041-1723
M1 - 5274
ER -