Abstract
Based on data from randomised controlled trials (RCT) on primary cervical screening, it has been reported that the problem of more frequent false-positive tests in Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA screening compared to cytology could be overcome. However, these reports predominantly operated with a narrow definition of a (false-)positive test. The aim of this paper was to illustrate how the narrow definition affected the measured adverse effects of HPV DNA screening compared with cytology screening.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | European Journal of Cancer |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 255-261 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISSN | 0959-8049 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2011 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- DNA, Viral
- Early Detection of Cancer
- False Positive Reactions
- Female
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Papillomaviridae
- Papillomavirus Infections
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Vaginal Smears