Gendered Perceptions and the Costs of Political Toxicity: Experimental Evidence from Politicians and Citizens in Four Democracies

Gregory Eady*, Anne Rasmussen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Politicians frequently face toxic behaviors. We argue that these behaviors impose a double burden on women, who may not only face higher exposure to toxicity, but experience attacks that they and others understand to be motivated by prejudice and designed to push them out of office. Using large-scale image-based conjoint experiments in the United States, Denmark, Belgium, and Chile, we demonstrate that both politicians themselves and citizens regard messages targeting women politicians as more toxic than otherwise equivalent messages targeting men. This perception intensifies when messages mention gender or come from perpetrators who are men. A second experiment to investigate the mechanisms shows that hostile behaviors toward women are more frequently understood as driven by prejudice and attempts to remove women from politics. These findings highlight the importance of understanding how perceptions of perpetrators' motives affect the severity of political toxicity, and provide insights into the gendered effects of political hostility.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Number of pages17
ISSN0003-0554
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association.

Cite this