TY - JOUR
T1 - Genome Sequencing Explores Complexity of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Recurrent Miscarriage
AU - Dong, Zirui
AU - Yan, Junhao
AU - Xu, Fengping
AU - Yuan, Jianying
AU - Jiang, Hui
AU - Wang, Huilin
AU - Chen, Haixiao
AU - Zhang, Lei
AU - Ye, Lingfei
AU - Xu, Jinjin
AU - Shi, Yuhua
AU - Yang, Zhenjun
AU - Cao, Ye
AU - Chen, Lingyun
AU - Li, Qiaoling
AU - Zhao, Xia
AU - Li, Jiguang
AU - Chen, Ao
AU - Zhang, Wenwei
AU - Wong, Hoi Gin
AU - Qin, Yingying
AU - Zhao, Han
AU - Chen, Yuan
AU - Li, Pei
AU - Ma, Tao
AU - Wang, Wen-Jing
AU - Kwok, Yvonne K.
AU - Jiang, Yuan
AU - Pursley, Amber N.
AU - Chung, Jacqueline P.W.
AU - Hong, Yan
AU - Kristiansen, Karsten
AU - Yang, Huanming
AU - Piña-Aguilar, Raul E.
AU - Leung, Tak Yeung
AU - Cheung, Sau Wai
AU - Morton, Cynthia C
AU - Choy, Kwong Wai
AU - Chen, Zi Jiang
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Recurrent miscarriage (RM) affects millions of couples globally, and half of them have no demonstrated etiology. Genome sequencing (GS) is an enhanced and novel cytogenetic tool to define the contribution of chromosomal abnormalities in human diseases. In this study we evaluated its utility in RM-affected couples. We performed low-pass GS retrospectively for 1,090 RM-affected couples, all of whom had routine chromosome analysis. A customized sequencing and interpretation pipeline was developed to identify chromosomal rearrangements and deletions/duplications with confirmation by fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray analysis, and PCR studies. Low-pass GS yielded results in 1,077 of 1,090 couples (98.8%) and detected 127 chromosomal abnormalities in 11.7% (126/1,077) of couples; both members of one couple were identified with inversions. Of the 126 couples, 39.7% (50/126) had received former diagnostic results by karyotyping characteristic of normal human male or female karyotypes. Low-pass GS revealed additional chromosomal abnormalities in 50 (4.0%) couples, including eight with balanced translocations and 42 inversions. Follow-up studies of these couples showed a higher miscarriage/fetal-anomaly rate of 5/10 (50%) compared to 21/93 (22.6%) in couples with normal GS, resulting in a relative risk of 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 4.6). In these couples, this protocol significantly increased the diagnostic yield of chromosomal abnormalities per couple (11.7%) in comparison to chromosome analysis (8.0%, chi-square test p = 0.000751). In summary, low-pass GS identified underlying chromosomal aberrations in 1 in 9 RM-affected couples, enabling identification of a subgroup of couples with increased risk of subsequent miscarriage who would benefit from a personalized intervention.
AB - Recurrent miscarriage (RM) affects millions of couples globally, and half of them have no demonstrated etiology. Genome sequencing (GS) is an enhanced and novel cytogenetic tool to define the contribution of chromosomal abnormalities in human diseases. In this study we evaluated its utility in RM-affected couples. We performed low-pass GS retrospectively for 1,090 RM-affected couples, all of whom had routine chromosome analysis. A customized sequencing and interpretation pipeline was developed to identify chromosomal rearrangements and deletions/duplications with confirmation by fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray analysis, and PCR studies. Low-pass GS yielded results in 1,077 of 1,090 couples (98.8%) and detected 127 chromosomal abnormalities in 11.7% (126/1,077) of couples; both members of one couple were identified with inversions. Of the 126 couples, 39.7% (50/126) had received former diagnostic results by karyotyping characteristic of normal human male or female karyotypes. Low-pass GS revealed additional chromosomal abnormalities in 50 (4.0%) couples, including eight with balanced translocations and 42 inversions. Follow-up studies of these couples showed a higher miscarriage/fetal-anomaly rate of 5/10 (50%) compared to 21/93 (22.6%) in couples with normal GS, resulting in a relative risk of 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 4.6). In these couples, this protocol significantly increased the diagnostic yield of chromosomal abnormalities per couple (11.7%) in comparison to chromosome analysis (8.0%, chi-square test p = 0.000751). In summary, low-pass GS identified underlying chromosomal aberrations in 1 in 9 RM-affected couples, enabling identification of a subgroup of couples with increased risk of subsequent miscarriage who would benefit from a personalized intervention.
KW - balanced translocation
KW - chromosomal abnormality
KW - chromothripsis and chomoplexy
KW - copy number variants
KW - cryptic structural rearrangements
KW - genetics complexity
KW - inversion
KW - low-pass genome sequencing
KW - preimplantation genetic testing
KW - recurrent miscarriage
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.003
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31679651
AN - SCOPUS:85075580234
VL - 105
SP - 1102
EP - 1111
JO - American Journal of Human Genetics
JF - American Journal of Human Genetics
SN - 0002-9297
IS - 6
ER -