TY - JOUR
T1 - Genomes of Pleistocene Siberian Wolves Uncover Multiple Extinct Wolf Lineages
AU - Ramos-Madrigal, Jazmín
AU - Sinding, Mikkel-Holger S
AU - Carøe, Christian
AU - Mak, Sarah S T
AU - Niemann, Jonas
AU - Samaniego Castruita, José A
AU - Fedorov, Sergey
AU - Kandyba, Alexander
AU - Germonpré, Mietje
AU - Bocherens, Hervé
AU - Feuerborn, Tatiana R
AU - Pitulko, Vladimir V
AU - Pavlova, Elena Y
AU - Nikolskiy, Pavel A
AU - Kasparov, Aleksei K
AU - Ivanova, Varvara V
AU - Larson, Greger
AU - Frantz, Laurent A F
AU - Willerslev, Eske
AU - Meldgaard, Morten
AU - Petersen, Bent
AU - Sicheritz-Ponten, Thomas
AU - Bachmann, Lutz
AU - Wiig, Øystein
AU - Hansen, Anders J
AU - Gilbert, M Thomas P
AU - Gopalakrishnan, Shyam
N1 - Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Extant Canis lupus genetic diversity can be grouped into three phylogenetically distinct clades: Eurasian and American wolves and domestic dogs.1 Genetic studies have suggested these groups trace their origins to a wolf population that expanded during the last glacial maximum (LGM)1-3 and replaced local wolf populations.4 Moreover, ancient genomes from the Yana basin and the Taimyr peninsula provided evidence of at least one extinct wolf lineage that dwelled in Siberia during the Pleistocene.35 Previous studies have suggested that Pleistocene Siberian canids can be classified into two groups based on cranial morphology. Wolves in the first group are most similar to present-day populations, although those in the second group possess intermediate features between dogs and wolves.67 However, whether this morphological classification represents distinct genetic groups remains unknown. To investigate this question and the relationships between Pleistocene canids, present-day wolves, and dogs, we resequenced the genomes of four Pleistocene canids from Northeast Siberia dated between >50 and 14 ka old, including samples from the two morphological categories. We found these specimens cluster with the two previously sequenced Pleistocene wolves, which are genetically more similar to Eurasian wolves. Our results show that, though the four specimens represent extinct wolf lineages, they do not form a monophyletic group. Instead, each Pleistocene Siberian canid branched off the lineage that gave rise to present-day wolves and dogs. Finally, our results suggest the two previously described morphological groups could represent independent lineages similarly related to present-day wolves and dogs.
AB - Extant Canis lupus genetic diversity can be grouped into three phylogenetically distinct clades: Eurasian and American wolves and domestic dogs.1 Genetic studies have suggested these groups trace their origins to a wolf population that expanded during the last glacial maximum (LGM)1-3 and replaced local wolf populations.4 Moreover, ancient genomes from the Yana basin and the Taimyr peninsula provided evidence of at least one extinct wolf lineage that dwelled in Siberia during the Pleistocene.35 Previous studies have suggested that Pleistocene Siberian canids can be classified into two groups based on cranial morphology. Wolves in the first group are most similar to present-day populations, although those in the second group possess intermediate features between dogs and wolves.67 However, whether this morphological classification represents distinct genetic groups remains unknown. To investigate this question and the relationships between Pleistocene canids, present-day wolves, and dogs, we resequenced the genomes of four Pleistocene canids from Northeast Siberia dated between >50 and 14 ka old, including samples from the two morphological categories. We found these specimens cluster with the two previously sequenced Pleistocene wolves, which are genetically more similar to Eurasian wolves. Our results show that, though the four specimens represent extinct wolf lineages, they do not form a monophyletic group. Instead, each Pleistocene Siberian canid branched off the lineage that gave rise to present-day wolves and dogs. Finally, our results suggest the two previously described morphological groups could represent independent lineages similarly related to present-day wolves and dogs.
U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.002
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33125870
VL - 31
SP - 198
EP - 206
JO - Current Biology
JF - Current Biology
SN - 0960-9822
ER -