TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidance on risk–benefit assessment of foods
AU - More, Simon John
AU - Benford, Diane
AU - Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne
AU - Bampidis, Vasileios
AU - Bragard, Claude
AU - Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi
AU - Hernández-Jerez, Antonio F.
AU - Koutsoumanis, Kostas
AU - Lambré, Claude
AU - Machera, Kyriaki
AU - Mullins, Ewen
AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
AU - Schlatter, Josef
AU - Schrenk, Dieter
AU - Turck, Dominique
AU - Naska, Androniki
AU - Poulsen, Morten
AU - Ranta, Jukka
AU - Sand, Salomon
AU - Wallace, Heather
AU - Bastaki, Maria
AU - Liem, Djien
AU - Smith, Anthony
AU - Ververis, Ermolaos
AU - Zamariola, Giorgia
AU - Younes, Maged
AU - EFSA Scientific Committee
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The EFSA Scientific Committee has updated its 2010 Guidance on risk?benefit assessment (RBA) of foods. The update addresses methodological developments and regulatory needs. While it retains the stepwise RBA approach, it provides additional methods for complex assessments, such as multiple chemical hazards and all relevant health effects impacting different population subgroups. The updated guidance includes approaches for systematic identification, prioritisation and selection of hazardous and beneficial food components. It also offers updates relevant to characterising adverse and beneficial effects, such as measures of effect size and dose?response modelling. The guidance expands options for characterising risks and benefits, incorporating variability, uncertainty, severity categorisation and ranking of different (beneficial or adverse) effects. The impact of different types of health effects is assessed qualitatively or quantitatively, depending on the problem formulation, scope of the RBA question and data availability. The integration of risks and benefits often involves value-based judgements and should ideally be performed with the risk?benefit manager. Metrics such as Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) can be used. Additional approaches are presented, such as probability of all relevant effects and/or effects of given severities and their integration using severity weight functions. The update includes practical guidance on reporting results, interpreting outcomes and communicating the outcome of an RBA, considering consumer perspectives and responses to advice.
AB - The EFSA Scientific Committee has updated its 2010 Guidance on risk?benefit assessment (RBA) of foods. The update addresses methodological developments and regulatory needs. While it retains the stepwise RBA approach, it provides additional methods for complex assessments, such as multiple chemical hazards and all relevant health effects impacting different population subgroups. The updated guidance includes approaches for systematic identification, prioritisation and selection of hazardous and beneficial food components. It also offers updates relevant to characterising adverse and beneficial effects, such as measures of effect size and dose?response modelling. The guidance expands options for characterising risks and benefits, incorporating variability, uncertainty, severity categorisation and ranking of different (beneficial or adverse) effects. The impact of different types of health effects is assessed qualitatively or quantitatively, depending on the problem formulation, scope of the RBA question and data availability. The integration of risks and benefits often involves value-based judgements and should ideally be performed with the risk?benefit manager. Metrics such as Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) can be used. Additional approaches are presented, such as probability of all relevant effects and/or effects of given severities and their integration using severity weight functions. The update includes practical guidance on reporting results, interpreting outcomes and communicating the outcome of an RBA, considering consumer perspectives and responses to advice.
KW - benefit–risk
KW - food safety
KW - RBA
KW - risk ranking
KW - risk–benefit
KW - risk–benefit assessment
KW - risk–benefit communication
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8875
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8875
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39015302
VL - 22
JO - E F S A Journal
JF - E F S A Journal
SN - 1831-4732
IS - 7
M1 - e8875
ER -