Health-related quality of life and days alive without life support or out of hospital: protocol

Anders Granholm, Olav Lilleholt Schjørring, Aksel Karl Georg Jensen, Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Marie Warrer Munch, Thomas Lass Klitgaard, Elena Crescioli, Maj-Brit Nørregaard Kjaer, Thomas Strøm, Anders Perner, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Morten Hylander Møller

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mortality is often the primary outcome in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) conducted in critically ill patients. Due to increased awareness on survivors after critical illness and outcomes other than mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and days alive without life support (DAWOLS) or days alive and out of hospital (DAAOOH) are increasingly being used. DAWOLS and DAAOOH convey more information than mortality, are easier to collect than HRQoL, and are usually assessed at earlier time points, which may be preferable in some situations. However, the associations between DAWOLS-DAAOOH and HRQoL are uncertain.

METHODS: We will assess associations between DAWOLS-DAAOOH at day 28 and 90 (independent variables/predictors) and HRQoL assessed using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (EQ-VAS and EQ-5D-5L index values) at 6 or 12 months (dependent variables) in 2 RCTs: the COVID STEROID 2 RCT conducted in adult patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia and the HOT-ICU RCT conducted in adult intensive care patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. We will describe associations using best-fitting fractional polynomial transformations separately in each dataset, with the resulting models presented and assessed in both datasets graphically and using measures of fit and prediction adequacy (i.e., internal performance and external validation). We will use multiple imputation if missingness exceeds 5%.

DISCUSSION: The outlined study will provide important knowledge on the associations between DAWOLS-DAAOOH and HRQoL in adult critically ill patients, which may help researchers and clinical trialists prioritise and select outcomes in future RCTs conducted in this population.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume66
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)295-301
Number of pages7
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cite this