TY - JOUR
T1 - Importance of risk assessment in timing of invasive coronary evaluation and treatment of patients with non–st-segment– elevation acute coronary syndrome
T2 - Insights from the verdict trial
AU - Butt, Jawad H.
AU - Kofoed, Klaus F.
AU - Kelbæk, Henning
AU - Hansen, Peter R.
AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian
AU - Høfsten, Dan
AU - Holmvang, Lene
AU - Pedersen, Frants
AU - Bang, Lia E.
AU - Sigvardsen, Per E.
AU - Clemmensen, Peter
AU - Linde, Jesper J.
AU - Heitmann, Merete
AU - Hove, Jens Dahlgaard
AU - Abdulla, Jawdat
AU - Gislason, Gunnar
AU - Engstrøm, Thomas
AU - Køber, Lars
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of invasive examination and treatment of high-risk patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome has not been established. We investigated the efficacy of early invasive coronary angiography compared with standard-care invasive coronary angiography on the risk of all-cause mortality according to the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score in a predefined subgroup analysis of the VERDICT (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with clinical suspicion of non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome with ECG changes indicating new ischemia and/or elevated troponin, in whom invasive coronary angiography was clinically indicated and deemed logistically feasible within 12 hours, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to an early (≤12 hours) or standard (48–72 hours) invasive strategy. The primary outcome of the present study was all-cause mortality. Of 2147 patients randomized in the VERDICT trial, 2092 patients had an available GRACE risk score. Of these, 1021 (48.8%) patients had a GRACE score >140. During a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 192 (18.8%) and 54 (5.0%) patients died in the high and low GRACE score groups, respectively. The risk of death with the early invasive strategy was increased in patients with a GRACE score ≤140 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.16–3.59]), whereas there was a trend toward a decreased risk of death with the early invasive strategy in patients with a GRACE score >140 (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63–1.10]) (Pinteraction =0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome, we found a significant interaction between timing of invasive coronary angiography and GRACE score on the risk of death. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety among high-risk and low-risk patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02061891.
AB - BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of invasive examination and treatment of high-risk patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome has not been established. We investigated the efficacy of early invasive coronary angiography compared with standard-care invasive coronary angiography on the risk of all-cause mortality according to the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score in a predefined subgroup analysis of the VERDICT (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with clinical suspicion of non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome with ECG changes indicating new ischemia and/or elevated troponin, in whom invasive coronary angiography was clinically indicated and deemed logistically feasible within 12 hours, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to an early (≤12 hours) or standard (48–72 hours) invasive strategy. The primary outcome of the present study was all-cause mortality. Of 2147 patients randomized in the VERDICT trial, 2092 patients had an available GRACE risk score. Of these, 1021 (48.8%) patients had a GRACE score >140. During a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 192 (18.8%) and 54 (5.0%) patients died in the high and low GRACE score groups, respectively. The risk of death with the early invasive strategy was increased in patients with a GRACE score ≤140 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.16–3.59]), whereas there was a trend toward a decreased risk of death with the early invasive strategy in patients with a GRACE score >140 (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63–1.10]) (Pinteraction =0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome, we found a significant interaction between timing of invasive coronary angiography and GRACE score on the risk of death. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety among high-risk and low-risk patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02061891.
KW - Acute coronary syndrome
KW - GRACE score
KW - Heart failure
KW - Invasive coronary angiography
KW - Mortality
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.121.022333
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.121.022333
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34585591
AN - SCOPUS:85118097021
VL - 10
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
SN - 2047-9980
IS - 19
M1 - e022333
ER -