Abstract
Why did union officials from a high-union-density country like Denmark choose to import an organising strategy from low-density countries such as the US and the UK? Drawing on in-depth interviews with key union officials and internal documents, the authors of this article argue two key points. First, rather than unions settling for a semi-automatic response to membership decline, the ‘organising model’ was actively imported as a strategic tool for challenging alternative responses to membership decline. Second, the organising model was actively translated into a Danish context and most unions cherry-pick some elements while leaving fundamental aspects out. The study nevertheless indicates that a lack of coherency and model-fit to Danish industrial relations might hamper the positive effects of the organising strategy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Economic and Industrial Democracy |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 297-317 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| ISSN | 0143-831X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Faculty of Social Sciences
- Denmark
- institutional diffusion
- organising
- trade unions
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS