Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Increased use of caesarean sections in pedigree dogs - A study based on data from the Danish Kennel Club 2013-2022

Jan Bojsen-Møller Secher*, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Sofie Thorsgaard Pedersen, Emma Fyrstelin Kristiansen, Peter Sandøe, Helle Friis Proschowsky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

657 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Dystocia is a common problem in dogs. It is often resolved by emergency caesarean section, which is an invasive procedure that poses a risk to the dam and her puppies, and can cause postoperative discomfort. The risk of death to both puppies and dams can be decreased by elective caesarean section in bitches with a high risk of dystocia. However, if elective caesarean sections lead to the continual breeding of bitches unable to give birth vaginally, the prevalence of dystocia is likely to increase. The aim of this study was to follow the prevalence of caesarean section in pedigree dogs registered in the Danish Kennel Club from 2013 to 2022 (n = 35,121 litters). Specifically, the prevalence was examined for the total population of pedigree dogs (12.7 %-15.5 %), for brachycephalic breeds (37.6 %-40.1 %), and for five selected individual breeds. We observed an increase in the prevalence of caesarean sections from 2013 to 2020, while the prevalence was more stable during the period 2020-2022. Major differences in prevalence were observed between breeds and specifically between brachycephalic and non-brachycephalic breeds, with higher levels in the former. Recently imposed legal limits on the number of caesarean sections performed on each bitch in combination with breeding guidelines that account for breed and reproductive history may serve to lower the use of caesarean sections.

Original languageEnglish
Article number117663
JournalTheriogenology
Volume249
Number of pages8
ISSN0093-691X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite this