TY - JOUR
T1 - Interpositional arthroplasty using cartilage allografts for treating temporomandibular joint arthrosis
T2 - a 3- and 5-year retrospective clinical follow-up study
AU - Nguyen, Van Son
AU - Kofod, Thomas
AU - Nisja, Even
AU - Hosseini, Mandana
AU - Worsaae, Nils
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the effect of arthroplasty using interpositional cartilage allografts in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrosis. Study Design: This retrospective study included patients treated consecutively between 2007 and 2013 using discectomy and interpositional grafting with lyophilized costal cartilage allograft (Tutoplast) sheets. TMJ pain based on the visual analogue scale (VAS), maximal interincisal opening (MIO), joint tenderness to palpation, crepitus from the affected joint, and postoperative complications were assessed. Results: Arthroplasty was performed on 37 joints among 34 patients (28 women; mean age: 54 years); 24 joints underwent simultaneous condyle shaving. At final follow-up (3 [n = 37] or 5 [n = 21] years), we observed reduced mean VAS (from 7.6 to 0.9; P < .001) increased mean MIO (from 32.5 to 41.1 mm; P < .001), number of joints with capsule tenderness (from 30 to 3; P < .001), and percentage of joints with crepitus (from 97% to 75%; P = .008). One joint required reoperation because of interposed cartilage fragmentation. No permanent facial nerve injury or malocclusion occurred after treatment. Conclusions: Interpositional arthroplasty is a relatively simple, moderately invasive, and effective surgical treatment for TMJ arthrosis with few complications. However, long-term outcomes of this treatment, specifically beyond 3-5 years postoperatively, remain unknown.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the effect of arthroplasty using interpositional cartilage allografts in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrosis. Study Design: This retrospective study included patients treated consecutively between 2007 and 2013 using discectomy and interpositional grafting with lyophilized costal cartilage allograft (Tutoplast) sheets. TMJ pain based on the visual analogue scale (VAS), maximal interincisal opening (MIO), joint tenderness to palpation, crepitus from the affected joint, and postoperative complications were assessed. Results: Arthroplasty was performed on 37 joints among 34 patients (28 women; mean age: 54 years); 24 joints underwent simultaneous condyle shaving. At final follow-up (3 [n = 37] or 5 [n = 21] years), we observed reduced mean VAS (from 7.6 to 0.9; P < .001) increased mean MIO (from 32.5 to 41.1 mm; P < .001), number of joints with capsule tenderness (from 30 to 3; P < .001), and percentage of joints with crepitus (from 97% to 75%; P = .008). One joint required reoperation because of interposed cartilage fragmentation. No permanent facial nerve injury or malocclusion occurred after treatment. Conclusions: Interpositional arthroplasty is a relatively simple, moderately invasive, and effective surgical treatment for TMJ arthrosis with few complications. However, long-term outcomes of this treatment, specifically beyond 3-5 years postoperatively, remain unknown.
U2 - 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.02.002
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38570274
AN - SCOPUS:85189369729
VL - 137
SP - 573
EP - 579
JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
SN - 2212-4403
IS - 6
ER -