Islet autoantibodies as precision diagnostic tools to characterize heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review

ADA/EASD PMDI, Jordi Merino (Member of author collaboration), Anne Cathrine B. Thuesen (Member of author collaboration), Mette K. Andersen (Member of author collaboration), Christoffer Clemmensen (Member of author collaboration), Torben Hansen (Member of author collaboration), Mariam Nakabuye (Member of author collaboration), Ruth J. F. Loos (Member of author collaboration), Marta Guasch-Ferré (Member of author collaboration), Tina Vilsbøll (Member of author collaboration)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Islet autoantibodies form the foundation for type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosis and staging, but heterogeneity exists in T1D development and presentation. We hypothesized that autoantibodies can identify heterogeneity before, at, and after T1D diagnosis, and in response to disease-modifying therapies.

METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed and EMBASE databases (6/14/2022) assessing 10 years of original research examining relationships between autoantibodies and heterogeneity before, at, after diagnosis, and in response to disease-modifying therapies in individuals at-risk or within 1 year of T1D diagnosis. A critical appraisal checklist tool for cohort studies was modified and used for risk of bias assessment.

RESULTS: Here we show that 152 studies that met extraction criteria most commonly characterized heterogeneity before diagnosis (91/152). Autoantibody type/target was most frequently examined, followed by autoantibody number. Recurring themes included correlations of autoantibody number, type, and titers with progression, differing phenotypes based on order of autoantibody seroconversion, and interactions with age and genetics. Only 44% specifically described autoantibody assay standardization program participation.

CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence most strongly supports the application of autoantibody features to more precisely define T1D before diagnosis. Our findings support continued use of pre-clinical staging paradigms based on autoantibody number and suggest that additional autoantibody features, particularly in relation to age and genetic risk, could offer more precise stratification. To improve reproducibility and applicability of autoantibody-based precision medicine in T1D, we propose a methods checklist for islet autoantibody-based manuscripts which includes use of precision medicine MeSH terms and participation in autoantibody standardization workshops.

Original languageEnglish
Article number66
JournalCommunications Medicine
Volume4
Issue number1
Number of pages8
ISSN2730-664X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

© 2024. The Author(s).

Cite this