Long-term outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Portico self-expanding valve

Arturo Giordano, Silvia Mas-Peiro, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Andreas Schaefer, Martin Beyer, Francesco Maisano, Guido Ascione, Nicola Buzzatti, Rui Teles, João Brito, Francisco Albuquerque, Lars Sondergaard, Maarten Vanhaverbeke, Angelo Quagliana, Giuliano Costa, Marco Barbanti, Paolo Ferraro, Alberto Morello, Michele Cimmino, Michele AlbaneseMartino Pepe, Luca Bardi, Salvatore Giordano, Antonio Cittadini, Nicola Corcione, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a mainstay in the management of severe aortic valve stenosis in elderly patients, but there is uncertainty on their long-term effectiveness. We aimed to assess the long-term outcome of patients undergoing TAVI with the Portico valve. Methods: We retrospectively collected the data on patients in whom TAVI with Portico was attempted from 7 high-volume centres. Only patients theoretically eligible for 3 or more years of follow-up were included. Clinical outcomes, including death, stroke, myocardial infarction, reintervention for valve degeneration and hemodynamic valve performance were systematically assessed. Results: A total of 803 patients were included, with 504 (62.8%) women, mean age of 82 years, median EuroSCORE II of 3.1%, and 386 (48.1%) subjects at low/moderate risk. The median follow-up was 3.0 years (3.0; 4.0). The composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and reintervention for valve degeneration occurred in 37.5% (95% confidence interval: 34.1–40.9%), with all-cause death in 35.1% (31.8–38.4%), stroke in 3.4% (1.3–3.4%), myocardial infarction in 1.0% (0.3–1.5%), and reintervention for valve degeneration in 1.1% (0.6–2.1%). The mean aortic valve gradient at follow-up was 8.1 ± 4.6 mmHg, and at least moderate aortic regurgitation was present in 9.1% (6.7–12.3%). Independent predictors of major adverse events or death were: peripheral artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, atrial fibrillation, prior pacemaker implantation, EuroSCORE II, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Portico use is associated with favorable long-term clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes were largely impacted by baseline risk factors and surgical risk.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Research in Cardiology
Volume113
Pages (from-to)86–93
Number of pages7
ISSN1861-0684
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Aortic stenosis
  • Portico
  • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Cite this