Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mass and metallicity scaling relations of high-redshift star-forming galaxies selected by GRBs

  • M. Arabsalmani
  • , P. Møller
  • , D.~A. Perley
  • , W. Freudling
  • , J.~P.~U. Fynbo
  • , E. Le Floc'h
  • , M.~A. Zwaan
  • , S. Schulze
  • , N.~R. Tanvir
  • , L. Christensen
  • , A.~J. Levan
  • , P. Jakobsson
  • , D. Malesani
  • , Z. Cano
  • , S. Covino
  • , V. D'Elia
  • , P. Goldoni
  • , A. Gomboc
  • , K.~E. Heintz
  • , M. Sparre
  • Antonio de Ugarte Postigo, S.~D. Vergani

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

We present a comprehensive study of the relations between gas kinematics, metallicity and stellar mass in a sample of 82 gamma-ray burst (GRB)-selected galaxies using absorption and emission methods. We find the velocity widths of both emission and absorption profiles to be a proxy of stellar mass. We also investigate the velocity-metallicity correlation and its evolution with redshift. Using 33 GRB hosts with measured stellar mass and metallicity, we study the mass-metallicity relation for GRB host galaxies in a stellar mass range of 10$^8.2$-10$^11.1$ M$_⊙$ and a redshift range of z sim 0.3-3.4. The GRB-selected galaxies appear to track the mass-metallicity relation of star-forming galaxies but with an offset of 0.15 towards lower metallicities. This offset is comparable with the average error bar on the metallicity measurements of the GRB sample and also the scatter on the mass-metallicity relation of the general population. It is hard to decide whether this relatively small offset is due to systematic effects or the intrinsic nature of GRB hosts. We also investigate the possibility of using absorption-line metallicity measurements of GRB hosts to study the mass-metallicity relation at high redshifts. Our analysis shows that the metallicity measurements from absorption methods can significantly differ from emission metallicities and assuming identical measurements from the two methods may result in erroneous conclusions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume473
Pages (from-to)3312-3324
Number of pages13
ISSN0035-8711
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Funding

MA would like to specially thank Thomas Krühler for very helpful discussions and also for providing stellar mass measurement prior to publication. MA also thanks Roberto Maiolino, Richard Ellis, Sambit Roychowdhury, Claudia Lagos, Jens Hjorth and Bernd Husemann for helpful discussions. We acknowledge the financial support from UnivEarthS Labex programme at Sorbonne Paris Cité (ANR-10-LABX-0023 and ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant agreement no. EGGS-278202. AdUP acknowledges support from the Spanish research project AYA 2014-58381-P, a Ramón y Cajal fellowship and a 2016 BBVA Foundation Grant for Researchers and Cultural Creators.

Cite this