Mining exploration infrastructure affects biophysical habitat characteristics and ground-dwelling arthropod communities

Kristen Fernandes*, Sophia Clark-Ioannou, Benjamin J. Saunders, Jonathan Majer, Philip W. Bateman, Michael Bunce, Paul Nevill

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Monitoring of environmental impacts of mining activities typically focuses on the main operation footprint, neglecting exploration infrastructure like tracks, roads, and drill pads. These areas are cleared of native vegetation and impacts on the surrounding environment can be both cumulative and enigmatic. Here, we study the impacts of mining exploration infrastructure on habitat characteristics and ground-dwelling arthropod communities in the Midwest region of Western Australia. The study was conducted at three mine sites, each with three infrastructure types: maintained tracks, unmaintained tracks, and drill pads along transects extending 100 m away from the disturbance into remnant vegetation. Habitat characteristics were measured, and arthropods collected from pitfall traps along these transects and identified using COI metabarcoding. The overall arthropod community and two indicator groups, ants (Formicidae) and springtails (Collembola) - were used to measure arthropod responses to changes in response to habitat disturbance. Whilst changes in habitat were only visible to 10 m from the disturbance, impacts on arthropod communities could be detected up to 100 m into the remnant vegetation, and these responses were more complex. In general, we found similar patterns expressed in the compositional changes for arthropods overall and between our chosen indicator groups, but they were not the same across all sites and infrastructure types. Our results demonstrate the utility of bulk arthropod metabarcoding and different arthropod indicator groups for documenting the effects of fine-scale habitat destruction, degradation, or disturbance. They also highlight the need to monitor the negative impacts of mineral exploration on the environment.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
Volume33
Issue number8-9
Pages (from-to)2465-2486
ISSN0960-3115
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This project was supported by the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Mine Site Restoration. Computational resources were provided by the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre, funding from the Australian Government, and the Government of Western Australia. KF was partially supported by funding from the Food Agility CRC. We would like to thank Marti J Anderson and Adam H Smith for their helpful advice on statistical analysis for this study. We also thank the mining companies, Sinosteel Midwest Corporation Ltd, Karara Mining Ltd, and Mount Gibson Iron Ltd for access to sites for sampling.

Funding Information:
This project was supported by the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Mine Site Restoration. Computational resources were provided by the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre, funding from the Australian Government, and the Government of Western Australia. KF was partially supported by funding from the Food Agility CRC.

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Keywords

  • Arthropod communities
  • DNA metabarcoding
  • Environmental impacts
  • Exploration infrastructure
  • Habitat characteristics
  • Indicator species
  • Mining

Cite this