Models and Modelling: Science Teachers' Perceived Practice and Rationales in Lower Secondary School in the Context of a Revised Competence-Oriented Curriculum

Sanne Schnell Nielsen*, Jan Alexis Nielsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

As part of curriculum reforms, models and modelling (MoMo) are playing an increasingly prominent role in science education. Through a questionnaire study, this paper investigates lower secondary school teachers' (n = 246) perceived practices of, rationales behind, and possibilities for working with MoMo in the context of the revised science curriculum. Our findings suggest that: (1) teachers prioritize the subject-specific knowledge embedded in models over and above the modelling process and meta-knowledge; (2) teachers prioritize engaging students in MoMo activities for descriptive rather than predictive purposes; (3) the process of designing, evaluating and revising models based on students' own inquiry only plays a minor role in teachers' practice and; (4) a content-heavy curriculum and multiple-choice exam are counterproductive to teachers' efforts to implement a more competence-oriented approach to MoMo. Our study also sheds light on, and discusses implications for, how to enhance teachers' possibilities of teaching for modelling-competence.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Volume17
Issue number4
Number of pages18
ISSN1305-8215
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 the authors; licensee Modestum. All Rights Reserved.

Keywords

  • modelling
  • modelling competence
  • models
  • science curriculum reform
  • science teachers' practices and rationales
  • scientific practices

Cite this