Paediatric CBCT protocols for image-guided radiotherapy; outcome of a survey across SIOP Europe affiliated countries and literature review

Daniella Elisabet Østergaard*, Abigail Bryce-Atkinson, Mikkel Skaarup, Bob Smulders, Lucy Siew Chen Davies, Gillian Whitfield, Geert O. Janssens, Lisa Lyngsie Hjalgrim, Ivan Vogelius Richter, Marcel van Herk, Marianne Aznar, Maja Vestmø Maraldo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background

Implementation of daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) into clinical practice in paediatric image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) lags behind compared to adults. Surveys report wide variation in practice for paediatric IGRT and technical information remains unreported. In this study we report on technical settings from applied paediatric CBCT protocols and review the literature for paediatric CBCT protocols.
Methods

From September to October 2022, a survey was conducted among 246 SIOPE-affiliated centres across 35 countries. The survey consisted of 3 parts: 1) baseline information; technical CBCT exposure settings and patient set-up procedure for 2) brain/head, and 3) abdomen. Descriptive statistics was used to summarise current practice. The literature was reviewed systematically with two reviewers obtaining consensus
Results

The literature search revealed 22 papers concerning paediatric CBCT protocols. Seven papers focused on dose-optimisation. Responses from 50/246 centres in 25/35 countries were collected: 44/50 treated with photons and 10/50 with protons. In total, 48 brain/head and 53 abdominal protocols were reported. 42/50 centres used kV-CBCT for brain/head and 35/50 for abdomen; daily CBCT was used for brain/head = 28/48 (58%) and abdomen = 33/53 62%. Greater consistency was seen in brain/head protocols (dose range 0.32 – 67.7 mGy) compared to abdominal (dose range 0.27 – 119.7 mGy).
Conclusion

Although daily CBCT is now widely used in paediatric IGRT, our survey demonstrates a wide range of technical settings, suggesting an unmet need to optimise paediatric IGRT protocols. This is in accordance with the literature. However, there are only few paediatric optimisation studies suggesting that dose reduction is possible while maintaining image quality.
Original languageEnglish
Article number109963
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume190
Number of pages8
ISSN0167-8140
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cone-beam CT
  • Image-guided radiotherapy
  • Paediatric cancer
  • Radiotherapy

Cite this