Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking: Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers

Julia Höhler*, Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé, Mikołaj Czajkowski, François J. Dessart, Paul J. Ferraro, Tongzhe Li, Kent D. Messer, Leah Palm-Forster, Mette Termansen, Fabian Thomas, Katarzyna Zagórska, Kahsay Haile Zemo, Jens Rommel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Economic experiments have emerged as a powerful tool for agricultural policy evaluations. In this perspective, we argue that involving stakeholders in the design of economic experiments is critical to satisfy mandates for evidence-based policies and encourage policymakers' usage of experimental results. To identify advantages and disadvantages of involving stakeholders when designing experiments, we synthesize observations from six experiments in Europe and North America. In these experiments, the primary advantage was the ability to learn within realistic decision environments and thus make relevant policy recommendations. Disadvantages include complicated implementation and constraints on treatment design. We compile 12 recommendations for researchers.

Original languageEnglish
JournalApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Volume46
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)338-359
Number of pages22
ISSN2040-5790
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • agricultural policy
  • agriculture
  • behavioral economics
  • experimental economics
  • participatory research
  • INVOLVEMENT
  • CHALLENGES

Cite this