TY - JOUR
T1 - Prebiotic and panthenol-containing dermocosmetic improves tolerance from artificial daylight photodynamic therapy
T2 - A randomized controlled trial in patients with actinic keratosis
AU - Fredman, Gabriella
AU - Jacobsen, Kevin
AU - Philipsen, Peter A.
AU - Wiegell, Stine R.
AU - Haedersdal, Merete
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Introduction & Objectives: Treatment with daylight photodynamic therapy (dPDT) of actinic keratosis (AK) is associated with local skin reactions (LSR), which may affect patients’ quality of life and treatment acceptability. This study explores the potential of a prebiotic and panthenol-containing Dermocosmetic Cream (DC) to enhance tolerance and mitigate post-dPDT induced LSR in the treatment of AKs. Materials & Methods: This randomized controlled, intra-individual trial included 20 patients with ≥10 AKs in two symmetrical areas on their face or décolleté, treated with a single session of artificial dPDT. After treatment, the two areas were randomized to DC twice daily for 14 days or No-DC. Primary outcomes included clinical signs of LSR graded from 0=none to 3=severe, calculated as a composite score, and assessed on Days 2, 7, 14, and 30 post-treatment, along with AK clearance rate. Secondary outcomes encompassed objectively measured erythema, and clinical and objective skin photoaging assessment. Results: Topical application of DC following dPDT significantly improved post-treatment tolerance up to two weeks. By Day 2, DC-treated skin had milder LSR (median 3.0, IQR 2.0-4.8) compared to No-DC skin (median 4.0, IQR 3.0-5.0; p=0.011). This improvement continued on Day 7 (DC median 3.0, IQR 2.0-3.8 vs. No-DC median 4.5, IQR 3.0-5.8; p<0.001) and Day 14 (DC median 1.0, IQR 0.0-1.0 vs. No-DC median 1.0, IQR 1.0-2.0; p=0.004). Objective measurements showed milder erythema in DC-treated areas on Day 2 (p=0.045) and Day 7 (p=0.005). Crusting resolved more effectively in DC-treated areas by Day 7 (40% vs. 20%; p=0.039). No significant difference in complete lesion response rate was observed between DC and No-DC skin (p=0.850). By Day 30, clinical photoaging assessment demonstrated significant improvement in dyspigmentation (p=0.004) and skin texture (p<0.001) in both locations. Moreover, objective measurements revealed reduced dyspigmentation in both DC and No-DC treated skin (p≤0.001). Conclusion: Application of a prebiotic and panthenol-containing multipurpose DC significantly enhanced tolerance from artificial dPDT and accelerated healing time up to 14 days after treatment. The use of DC cream did not affect the overall treatment efficacy of dPDT, indicating its potential to enhance patient comfort following dPDT.
AB - Introduction & Objectives: Treatment with daylight photodynamic therapy (dPDT) of actinic keratosis (AK) is associated with local skin reactions (LSR), which may affect patients’ quality of life and treatment acceptability. This study explores the potential of a prebiotic and panthenol-containing Dermocosmetic Cream (DC) to enhance tolerance and mitigate post-dPDT induced LSR in the treatment of AKs. Materials & Methods: This randomized controlled, intra-individual trial included 20 patients with ≥10 AKs in two symmetrical areas on their face or décolleté, treated with a single session of artificial dPDT. After treatment, the two areas were randomized to DC twice daily for 14 days or No-DC. Primary outcomes included clinical signs of LSR graded from 0=none to 3=severe, calculated as a composite score, and assessed on Days 2, 7, 14, and 30 post-treatment, along with AK clearance rate. Secondary outcomes encompassed objectively measured erythema, and clinical and objective skin photoaging assessment. Results: Topical application of DC following dPDT significantly improved post-treatment tolerance up to two weeks. By Day 2, DC-treated skin had milder LSR (median 3.0, IQR 2.0-4.8) compared to No-DC skin (median 4.0, IQR 3.0-5.0; p=0.011). This improvement continued on Day 7 (DC median 3.0, IQR 2.0-3.8 vs. No-DC median 4.5, IQR 3.0-5.8; p<0.001) and Day 14 (DC median 1.0, IQR 0.0-1.0 vs. No-DC median 1.0, IQR 1.0-2.0; p=0.004). Objective measurements showed milder erythema in DC-treated areas on Day 2 (p=0.045) and Day 7 (p=0.005). Crusting resolved more effectively in DC-treated areas by Day 7 (40% vs. 20%; p=0.039). No significant difference in complete lesion response rate was observed between DC and No-DC skin (p=0.850). By Day 30, clinical photoaging assessment demonstrated significant improvement in dyspigmentation (p=0.004) and skin texture (p<0.001) in both locations. Moreover, objective measurements revealed reduced dyspigmentation in both DC and No-DC treated skin (p≤0.001). Conclusion: Application of a prebiotic and panthenol-containing multipurpose DC significantly enhanced tolerance from artificial dPDT and accelerated healing time up to 14 days after treatment. The use of DC cream did not affect the overall treatment efficacy of dPDT, indicating its potential to enhance patient comfort following dPDT.
KW - Actinic keratosis
KW - Dermocosmetic cream
KW - Local skin reactions
KW - Photodamage
KW - Photodynamic therapy
U2 - 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104394
DO - 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104394
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39528008
AN - SCOPUS:85209538119
VL - 50
JO - Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
JF - Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
SN - 1572-1000
M1 - 104394
ER -