Procedural Developments in Investment Arbitration

Szilárd Gáspár-Szilágyi; Maxim Usynin

doi:10.1163/15718034-12341424

Procedural Developments in Investment Arbitration

Szilárd Gáspár-Szilágyi^*, Maxim Usynin

^*Corresponding author for this work

CEPRI - Centre for Private Governance

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

140 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this column, we will focus on procedural developments in recent investment arbitration cases, relying on publicly available interim decisions and final awards, handed down in the period of 1 January 2019 - 31 March 2020. Given the large number of new cases, decisions and awards, we decided to focus on a dozen of them, which we believe tackle novel issues or present complex procedural matters.

Original language	English
Journal	The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals
Volume	19
Issue number	2
Pages (from-to)	269-303
Number of pages	35
ISSN	1569-1853
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341424
Publication status	Published - 26 Aug 2020

Keywords

Faculty of Law
Investment Arbitration
Procedure
Tatarstan v Ukraine
Garcia Armas v Venezuela
Besserglik v. Mozambique

Access to Document

10.1163/15718034-12341424

Gáspár-Szilágyi_Usynin_2020_Procedural Developments in Investment ArbitrationSubmitted manuscript, 444 KB

Cite this

@article{e4b0a2be08b44ea98d980b6acdb394ad,

title = "Procedural Developments in Investment Arbitration",

abstract = "In this column, we will focus on procedural developments in recent investment arbitration cases, relying on publicly available interim decisions and final awards, handed down in the period of 1 January 2019 - 31 March 2020. Given the large number of new cases, decisions and awards, we decided to focus on a dozen of them, which we believe tackle novel issues or present complex procedural matters.",

keywords = "Faculty of Law, Investment Arbitration, Procedure, Tatarstan v Ukraine, Garcia Armas v Venezuela, Besserglik v. Mozambique",

author = "Szil{\'a}rd G{\'a}sp{\'a}r-Szil{\'a}gyi and Maxim Usynin",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

day = "26",

doi = "10.1163/15718034-12341424",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "269--303",

journal = "Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals",

issn = "1569-1853",

publisher = "Brill - Nijhoff",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procedural Developments in Investment Arbitration

AU - Gáspár-Szilágyi, Szilárd

AU - Usynin, Maxim

PY - 2020/8/26

Y1 - 2020/8/26

N2 - In this column, we will focus on procedural developments in recent investment arbitration cases, relying on publicly available interim decisions and final awards, handed down in the period of 1 January 2019 - 31 March 2020. Given the large number of new cases, decisions and awards, we decided to focus on a dozen of them, which we believe tackle novel issues or present complex procedural matters.

AB - In this column, we will focus on procedural developments in recent investment arbitration cases, relying on publicly available interim decisions and final awards, handed down in the period of 1 January 2019 - 31 March 2020. Given the large number of new cases, decisions and awards, we decided to focus on a dozen of them, which we believe tackle novel issues or present complex procedural matters.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - Investment Arbitration

KW - Procedure

KW - Tatarstan v Ukraine

KW - Garcia Armas v Venezuela

KW - Besserglik v. Mozambique

UR - https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3577586

U2 - 10.1163/15718034-12341424

DO - 10.1163/15718034-12341424

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 269

EP - 303

JO - Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals

JF - Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals

SN - 1569-1853

IS - 2

ER -

Procedural Developments in Investment Arbitration

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this