Prolonged venous thromboembolic prophylaxis — are current guidelines justified with the use of enhanced recovery after surgery and minimal invasive colorectal surgery?

Claus A. Bertelsen; Jakob Kleif

doi:10.1111/codi.16253

Prolonged venous thromboembolic prophylaxis — are current guidelines justified with the use of enhanced recovery after surgery and minimal invasive colorectal surgery?

Claus A. Bertelsen^*
, Jakob Kleif

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › Research › peer-review

73 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Journal	Colorectal Disease
Volume	25
Issue number	2
Pages (from-to)	326-327
Number of pages	2
ISSN	1462-8910
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16253
Publication status	Published - 2023

Access to Document

10.1111/codi.16253

FulltextAccepted author manuscript, 176 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Library access?

Check availability at the Royal Danish Library

Cite this

@article{04d4bd315e1543dc9e4f5e4c985407ff,

title = "Prolonged venous thromboembolic prophylaxis — are current guidelines justified with the use of enhanced recovery after surgery and minimal invasive colorectal surgery?",

author = "Bertelsen, \{Claus A.\} and Jakob Kleif",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.1111/codi.16253",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "326--327",

journal = "Colorectal Disease",

issn = "1462-8910",