TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective, population-based study of occupational movements and postures of the neck as risk factors for cervical disc herniation
AU - Petersen, Jonathan Aavang
AU - Brauer, Charlotte
AU - Thygesen, Lau Caspar
AU - Flachs, Esben Meulengracht
AU - Lund, Christina Bach
AU - Thomsen, Jane Frølund
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective We studied the associations between objectively measured occupational neck exposures in a job exposure matrix (JEM) and cervical disc herniation (CDH). Design A cohort study of Danish workers who ever held at least one of 29 jobs (eg, dentists, hairdressers, childcare, carpenters) from 1981 to 2016 was formed. Representative whole work-day inclinometric measurements from previous studies using triaxial accelerometers measuring neck angular velocity and posture of the neck were used as exposure in a JEM. Job titles were retrieved from the Danish Occupational Cohort with eXposure data database. The risk of CDH by quintiles of cumulated exposure was assessed by incidence rate ratios (IRR), adjusted for age, sex, calendar-year, previous lumbar disc herniation and educational level, using Poisson regression models. Setting Nationwide Danish registers. Participants 852 625 Danish workers within 29 different job-titles. Outcome measures First diagnosis of CDH was retrieved from the Danish National Patient Register. Results We found 14 000 cases of CDH during 20.2 million person-years of follow-up. Increasing levels of neck angular velocity showed a decreasing risk with IRR 0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.95) when the highest level of cumulative exposure (dynamic work) was compared with the lowest (static work). Similar results were found for extension and flexion of the neck, though not statistically significant for extension. Multiple sensitivity analyses did not change the results. Conclusion In this large register-based study based on a JEM, we found no evidence of an increased risk of CDH with increasing cumulated angular velocity, flexion or extension of the neck. Factors other than occupational dynamic neck movements and bent neck position seem to be important in the development of CDH.
AB - Objective We studied the associations between objectively measured occupational neck exposures in a job exposure matrix (JEM) and cervical disc herniation (CDH). Design A cohort study of Danish workers who ever held at least one of 29 jobs (eg, dentists, hairdressers, childcare, carpenters) from 1981 to 2016 was formed. Representative whole work-day inclinometric measurements from previous studies using triaxial accelerometers measuring neck angular velocity and posture of the neck were used as exposure in a JEM. Job titles were retrieved from the Danish Occupational Cohort with eXposure data database. The risk of CDH by quintiles of cumulated exposure was assessed by incidence rate ratios (IRR), adjusted for age, sex, calendar-year, previous lumbar disc herniation and educational level, using Poisson regression models. Setting Nationwide Danish registers. Participants 852 625 Danish workers within 29 different job-titles. Outcome measures First diagnosis of CDH was retrieved from the Danish National Patient Register. Results We found 14 000 cases of CDH during 20.2 million person-years of follow-up. Increasing levels of neck angular velocity showed a decreasing risk with IRR 0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.95) when the highest level of cumulative exposure (dynamic work) was compared with the lowest (static work). Similar results were found for extension and flexion of the neck, though not statistically significant for extension. Multiple sensitivity analyses did not change the results. Conclusion In this large register-based study based on a JEM, we found no evidence of an increased risk of CDH with increasing cumulated angular velocity, flexion or extension of the neck. Factors other than occupational dynamic neck movements and bent neck position seem to be important in the development of CDH.
KW - epidemiology
KW - occupational & industrial medicine
KW - spine
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053999
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053999
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35228284
AN - SCOPUS:85125589733
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 2
M1 - e053999
ER -