Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quality-of-care standards in adult type 3 intestinal failure caused by benign disease: A European society of clinical nutrition and metabolism (ESPEN) position paper

S. Lal*, M. Soop, C. Cuerda, P. Jeppesen, F. Joly, G. Lamprecht, M. Mundi, K. Szczepanek, C. Van Gossum, G. Wanten, T. Vanuytsel, A. Weimann, L. Pironi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Outcomes related to chronic intestinal failure (CIF) vary significantly within and between countries. While there are extensive European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines on the delivery of optimal care in CIF, there are no international consensus recommendations on the structure or resources required, nor on the process and appropriate outcome measures for delivering such quality care in CIF. Aim: The aim of this position paper is therefore to devise ESPEN-endorsed, internationally agreed quality of care standards, covering the resources, systems and standards that centres should aim for in order to deliver optimal CIF care. Methods: Members of the Home Artificial Nutrition-CIF Special Interest Group of ESPEN proposed an initial set of quality-of-care standards which was submitted to voting amongst clinicians from international CIF centres using a modified Delphi process, with participants rating each proposed statement as ‘essential’, ‘recommended’ or ‘not required’. Any statement receiving 80% of more ‘not required’ responses was excluded. Results: All 30 proposed standards relating to the structure, 18 relating to the process and 16 to the outcome measures of CIF care were deemed to be essential or recommended in more than 80% of respondents. Conclusion: This is the first paper to determine and describe internationally-agreed quality of care standards in CIF, which are now aimed at forming the basis for all CIF teams to develop and monitor their service, while also informing policymakers and payers on the infrastructure required for the optimal approach to multi-disciplinary team CIF care delivery. The recording of standardised outcomes should also allow internal and external benchmarking of care delivery within and between CIF centres.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Nutrition ESPEN
Volume63
Pages (from-to)696-701
Number of pages6
ISSN2405-4577
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

Cite this