Abstract
This article makes two arguments: (1) a specific argument about two passages in the 16th
and 19th songs of the Odyssey; (2) a general argument about the dangers involved in translations of classical texts. In the specific argument it is shown that translators have (with a
single exception) distorted Greek terms for skin colour, and, by doing so, they enable racist
agendas to gain support from their translations. The general argument is that in questions
that are the subject of controversy and discussion in the 21st century translators of classical
texts have to be careful to recognise their own preconceptions and prejudices to ensure
that the translations are not used for detrimental purposes.
and 19th songs of the Odyssey; (2) a general argument about the dangers involved in translations of classical texts. In the specific argument it is shown that translators have (with a
single exception) distorted Greek terms for skin colour, and, by doing so, they enable racist
agendas to gain support from their translations. The general argument is that in questions
that are the subject of controversy and discussion in the 21st century translators of classical
texts have to be careful to recognise their own preconceptions and prejudices to ensure
that the translations are not used for detrimental purposes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Universite de Copenhague. Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin. Cahiers |
| Volume | 92 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-24 |
| ISSN | 0591-0358 |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Faculty of Humanities
- Homer
- Odyssey
- Translation
- Racism
- Colour