Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recommendations for defining treatment outcomes in major psychiatric disorders using real-world data

Elise Koch, Sophie Smart, Guðmundur Einarsson, Anders Kämpe, Lina Jonsson, Maris Alver, Matthew Iveson, Andreas Göteson, Antonio F. Pardiñas, Ida E. Sønderby, Kevin S. O'Connell, Qingqin Li, Yi Lu, Hreinn Stefánsson, Kári Stefánsson, Heather Whalley, Mikael Landén, Michael C. O'Donovan, Knut Smerud, Gerard R. DawsonThomas Werge, Alfonso Buil, Andreas Reif, Lili Milani, Espen Molden, Chiara Fabbri, Alessandro Serretti, James Walters, Cathryn M. Lewis, Ole A. Andreassen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although information from real-world data can be used to identify factors that aid treatment choice, there are no guidelines for the use of such data. The aim of this Review is to summarise and evaluate definitions of treatment outcomes for antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilisers when using real-world data, and to suggest standards for the field. Given that no standards for the use of these data in estimating treatment outcomes exist, variability is high for treatment outcome definitions. We make recommendations for different scenarios of available data and highlight the importance of using other sources of information to validate proxy measures such as continued treatment, switching between medications, or polypharmacy of psychotropic medications. Well defined and validated treatment outcome measures that incorporate real-world data could facilitate the development of precision psychiatry approaches and support regulatory decision making regarding psychopharmacological agents.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Lancet Psychiatry
Volume12
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)457-468
Number of pages12
ISSN2215-0366
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd

Cite this