Reduced leaflet motion after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement

Ole de Backer*, George D. Dangas, Hasan Jilaihawi, Jonathon A. Leipsic, Christian J. Terkelsen, Raj Makkar, Annapoorna S. Kini, Karsten T. Veien, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Won Keun Kim, Prakash Balan, Nicolas van Mieghem, Ole N. Mathiassen, Raban V. Jeger, Martin Arnold, Roxana Mehran, Ana H.C. Guimarães, Bjarne L. Nørgaard, Klaus F. Kofoed, Philipp BlankeStephan Windecker, Lars Søndergaard, GALILEO-4D Investigators

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

230 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Subclinical leaflet thickening and reduced leaflet motion of bioprosthetic aortic valves have been documented by four-dimensional computed tomography (CT). Whether anticoagulation can reduce these phenomena after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is not known. METHODS In a substudy of a large randomized trial, we randomly assigned patients who had undergone successful TAVR and who did not have an indication for long-term anticoagulation to a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy (rivaroxaban [10 mg] plus aspirin [75 to 100 mg] once daily) or an antiplatelet-based strategy (clopidogrel [75 mg] plus aspirin [75 to 100 mg] once daily). Patients underwent evaluation by four-dimensional CT at a mean (±SD) of 90±15 days after randomization. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with at least one prosthetic valve leaflet with grade 3 or higher motion reduction (i.e., involving >50% of the leaflet). Leaflet thickening was also assessed. RESULTS A total of 231 patients were enrolled. At least one prosthetic valve leaflet with grade 3 or higher motion reduction was found in 2 of 97 patients (2.1%) who had scans that could be evaluated in the rivaroxaban group, as compared with 11 of 101 (10.9%) in the antiplatelet group (difference, -8.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.5 to -1.9; P=0.01). Thickening of at least one leaflet was observed in 12 of 97 patients (12.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 33 of 102 (32.4%) in the antiplatelet group (difference, -20.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -30.9 to -8.5). In the main trial, the risk of death or thromboembolic events and the risk of life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding were higher with rivaroxaban (hazard ratios of 1.35 and 1.50, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In a substudy of a trial involving patients without an indication for long-term anticoagulation who had undergone successful TAVR, a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy was more effective than an antiplatelet-based strategy in preventing subclinical leaflet-motion abnormalities. However, in the main trial, the rivaroxaban-based strategy was associated with a higher risk of death or thromboembolic complications and a higher risk of bleeding than the antiplatelet-based strategy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume382
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)130-139
Number of pages10
ISSN0028-4793
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Cite this