Response to the commentary “Anaesthesia for caesarean section and the miscredit of top-up epidurals”

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

Original language	English
Journal	European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume	286
Pages (from-to)	147-148
Number of pages	2
ISSN	0301-2115
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.004
Publication status	Published - 2023

Access to Document

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

@article{e8446cdad8574b528b3acc7cf5b90ac9,

title = "Response to the commentary “Anaesthesia for caesarean section and the miscredit of top-up epidurals”",

author = "Ammitzb{\o}ll, {I. L.A.} and Andersen, {B. R.} and Lange, {K. H.W.} and T. Clausen and L{\o}kkegaard, {E. C.L.}",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.004",

language = "English",

volume = "286",

pages = "147--148",

journal = "European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology",

issn = "0301-2115",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to the commentary “Anaesthesia for caesarean section and the miscredit of top-up epidurals”

AU - Ammitzbøll, I. L.A.

AU - Andersen, B. R.

AU - Lange, K. H.W.

AU - Clausen, T.

AU - Løkkegaard, E. C.L.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.004

M3 - Letter

C2 - 37253648

AN - SCOPUS:85161515211

VL - 286

SP - 147

EP - 148

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0301-2115

ER -