Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

Siri Vinther; Ole Haagen Nielsen; Jacob Rosenberg; Niels Keiding; Torben V Schroeder

Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

Siri Vinther, Ole Haagen Nielsen, Jacob Rosenberg, Niels Keiding, Torben V Schroeder

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.

Original language	English
Article number	A4479
Journal	Danish Medical Bulletin (Online)
Volume	59
Issue number	8
ISSN	1603-9629
Publication status	Published - Aug 2012

Access to Document

http://www.danmedj.dk/portal/page/portal/danmedj.dk/dmj_forside/PAST_ISSUE/2012/DMJ_2012_08/A4479

Cite this

@article{aecaf6799e464429900dfb70cc599f11,

title = "Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in {"}Ugeskrift for L{\ae}ger{"}",

abstract = "Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.",

author = "Siri Vinther and Nielsen, {Ole Haagen} and Jacob Rosenberg and Niels Keiding and Schroeder, {Torben V}",

year = "2012",

month = aug,

language = "English",

volume = "59",

journal = "Danish Medical Journal",

issn = "2245-1919",

publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

AU - Vinther, Siri

AU - Nielsen, Ole Haagen

AU - Rosenberg, Jacob

AU - Keiding, Niels

AU - Schroeder, Torben V

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.

AB - Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 59

JO - Danish Medical Journal

JF - Danish Medical Journal

SN - 2245-1919

IS - 8

M1 - A4479

ER -