Abstract
Background: Information on methods of suicide is available online, and access to information on methods of suicide appears to contribute to a small but significant proportion of suicides.There is limited documentation of how methods of suicide are being profiled, as well as what content exists in other languages than English. Aim: We aimed to analyze and compare how methods of suicide are profiled on Danish and English-language websites. Method: We applied a categorization and content analysis of websites describing methods of suicide. Sites were retrieved by applying widely used Danish and English-language search terms. Results: A total of 136 English-language websites and 106 Danish-language websites were included for analysis. Websites were more often categorized as prevention or support sites, academic or policy sites, and against suicide sites than dedicated suicide sites (i.e., pro-suicide sites), or information sites. However, information on methods of suicide was available, and 20.1% and 8.9% of the English and Danish-language sites, respectively, suggested that a particular method of suicide was quick. easy. painless, or certain to result in death. Limitations: Only one author coded and analyzed all websites. A further operationalization of the content analysis checklist is warranted to increase reliability. Conclusion: The websites primarily had a prevention or anti-suicide focus, but information on methods of suicide was available, requiring an increased focus on how to diminish the negative effects of harmful online content.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 136-143 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISSN | 0227-5910 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- methods of suicide
- Internet and suicidal behavior
- content analysis
- GOOGLING SUICIDE
- INTERNET USE
- INFORMATION
- ACCESSIBILITY
- PREVENTION
- PEOPLE