Self-Reported Versus Accelerometer-Assessed Daily Physical Activity in Childhood Obesity Treatment

Theresia Maria Schnurr, Bianca Bech, Tenna Ruest Haarmark Nielsen, Ida Gillberg Andersen, Mads Fiil Hjorth, Mette Aadahl, Cilius Esmann Fonvig, Torben Hansen, Jens-Christian Holm

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between interview-based subjective ratings of physical activity (PA) engagement and accelerometer-assessed objective measured PA in children and adolescents with overweight or obesity. A total of 92 children and adolescents (40 males, 52 females) with BMI ≥ 90th percentile for sex and age, aged 5–17 years had valid GT3X + accelerometer-assessed PA and interview-assessed self-reported information on PA engagement at the time of enrollment in a multidisciplinary outpatient tertiary treatment for childhood obesity. Accelerometer-derived mean overall PA and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical intensity were generated, applying cut-offs based on Vector Magnitude settings as defined by Romanzini et al. (2014), and a physical activity score (PAS) based on self-reported data was calculated. Overall, a higher self-reported PAS was correlated with higher accelerometer-assessed daily total PA levels (r = 0.34, p < .01) and children who reported a high PAS were more physically active compared with children who reported a low PAS. There was a fair level of agreement between self-reported PAS and accelerometer-assessed PA (Kappa agreement = 0.23; 95% CI = [0.03, 0.43]; p = .01). PAS, derived from self-report, may be a useful instrument for evaluating PA at a group level among children and adolescents enrolled in multidisciplinary obesity treatment.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
Volume124
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)795-811
Number of pages17
ISSN0031-5125
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this