Abstract
The current cosmological probes have provided a fantastic confirmation of the standard A Cold Dark Matter cosmological model, which has been constrained with unprecedented accuracy. However, with the increase of the experimental sensitivity, a few statistically significant tensions between different independent cosmological datasets emerged. While these tensions can be in part the result of systematic errors, the persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the need for new physics. In this Letter of Interest we will focus on the 4.4 sigma - tension between the Planck estimate of the Hubble constant H-0 and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the H-0 evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we will list a few interesting models of new physics that could solve this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102605 |
Journal | Astroparticle Physics |
Volume | 131 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISSN | 0927-6505 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sep 2021 |
Keywords
- OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS
- DARK ENERGY
- H-0
- CALIBRATION
- NEUTRINOS
- PLANCK
- SAMPLE
- CMB
Access to Document
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Snowmass2021-Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II : The hubble constant tension. / Di Valentino, Eleonora; Anchordoqui, Luis A.; Akarsu, Ozgur; Ali-Haimoud, Yacine; Amendola, Luca; Arendse, Nikki; Asgari, Marika; Ballardini, Mario; Basilakos, Spyros; Battistelli, Elia; Benetti, Micol; Birrer, Simon; Bouchet, Francois R.; Bruni, Marco; Calabrese, Erminia; Camarena, David; Capozziello, Salvatore; Chen, Angela; Chluba, Jens; Chudaykin, Anton; Colgain, Eoin O.; Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan; de Bernardis, Paolo; Perez, Javier de Cruz; Delabrouille, Jacques; Dunkley, Jo; Escamilla-Rivera, Celia; Ferte, Agnes; Finelli, Fabio; Freedman, Wendy; Frusciante, Noemi; Giusarma, Elena; Gomez-Valent, Adria; Guy, Julien; Handley, Will; Harrison, Ian; Hart, Luke; Heavens, Alan; Hildebrandt, Hendrik; Holz, Daniel; Huterer, Dragan; Ivanov, Mikhail M.; Joudaki, Shahab; Kamionkowski, Marc; Karwal, Tanvi; Knox, Lloyd; Kumar, Suresh; Lamagna, Luca; Lesgourgues, Julien; Lucca, Matteo; Marra, Valerio; Masi, Silvia; Matarrese, Sabino; Mazumdar, Arindam; Melchiorri, Alessandro; Mena, Olga; Mersini-Houghton, Laura; Miranda, Vivian; Moreno-Pulido, Cristian; Mota, David F.; Muir, Jessica; Mukherjee, Ankan; Niedermann, Florian; Notari, Alessio; Nunes, Rafael C.; Pace, Francesco; Paliathanasis, Andronikos; Palmese, Antonella; Pan, Supriya; Paoletti, Daniela; Pettorino, Valeria; Piacentini, Francesco; Poulin, Vivian; Raveri, Marco; Riess, Adam G.; Salzano, Vincenzo; Saridakis, Emmanuel N.; Sen, Anjan A.; Shafieloo, Arman; Shajib, Anowar J.; Silk, Joseph; Silvestri, Alessandra; Sloth, Martin S.; Smith, Tristan L.; Peracaula, Joan Sola; van de Bruck, Carsten; Verde, Licia; Visinelli, Luca; Wandelta, Benjamin D.; Wang, Deng; Wang, Jian-Min; Yadav, Anil K.; Yang, Weiqiang.
In: Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 131, 102605, 09.2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Snowmass2021-Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II
T2 - The hubble constant tension
AU - Di Valentino, Eleonora
AU - Anchordoqui, Luis A.
AU - Akarsu, Ozgur
AU - Ali-Haimoud, Yacine
AU - Amendola, Luca
AU - Arendse, Nikki
AU - Asgari, Marika
AU - Ballardini, Mario
AU - Basilakos, Spyros
AU - Battistelli, Elia
AU - Benetti, Micol
AU - Birrer, Simon
AU - Bouchet, Francois R.
AU - Bruni, Marco
AU - Calabrese, Erminia
AU - Camarena, David
AU - Capozziello, Salvatore
AU - Chen, Angela
AU - Chluba, Jens
AU - Chudaykin, Anton
AU - Colgain, Eoin O.
AU - Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan
AU - de Bernardis, Paolo
AU - Perez, Javier de Cruz
AU - Delabrouille, Jacques
AU - Dunkley, Jo
AU - Escamilla-Rivera, Celia
AU - Ferte, Agnes
AU - Finelli, Fabio
AU - Freedman, Wendy
AU - Frusciante, Noemi
AU - Giusarma, Elena
AU - Gomez-Valent, Adria
AU - Guy, Julien
AU - Handley, Will
AU - Harrison, Ian
AU - Hart, Luke
AU - Heavens, Alan
AU - Hildebrandt, Hendrik
AU - Holz, Daniel
AU - Huterer, Dragan
AU - Ivanov, Mikhail M.
AU - Joudaki, Shahab
AU - Kamionkowski, Marc
AU - Karwal, Tanvi
AU - Knox, Lloyd
AU - Kumar, Suresh
AU - Lamagna, Luca
AU - Lesgourgues, Julien
AU - Lucca, Matteo
AU - Marra, Valerio
AU - Masi, Silvia
AU - Matarrese, Sabino
AU - Mazumdar, Arindam
AU - Melchiorri, Alessandro
AU - Mena, Olga
AU - Mersini-Houghton, Laura
AU - Miranda, Vivian
AU - Moreno-Pulido, Cristian
AU - Mota, David F.
AU - Muir, Jessica
AU - Mukherjee, Ankan
AU - Niedermann, Florian
AU - Notari, Alessio
AU - Nunes, Rafael C.
AU - Pace, Francesco
AU - Paliathanasis, Andronikos
AU - Palmese, Antonella
AU - Pan, Supriya
AU - Paoletti, Daniela
AU - Pettorino, Valeria
AU - Piacentini, Francesco
AU - Poulin, Vivian
AU - Raveri, Marco
AU - Riess, Adam G.
AU - Salzano, Vincenzo
AU - Saridakis, Emmanuel N.
AU - Sen, Anjan A.
AU - Shafieloo, Arman
AU - Shajib, Anowar J.
AU - Silk, Joseph
AU - Silvestri, Alessandra
AU - Sloth, Martin S.
AU - Smith, Tristan L.
AU - Peracaula, Joan Sola
AU - van de Bruck, Carsten
AU - Verde, Licia
AU - Visinelli, Luca
AU - Wandelta, Benjamin D.
AU - Wang, Deng
AU - Wang, Jian-Min
AU - Yadav, Anil K.
AU - Yang, Weiqiang
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - The current cosmological probes have provided a fantastic confirmation of the standard A Cold Dark Matter cosmological model, which has been constrained with unprecedented accuracy. However, with the increase of the experimental sensitivity, a few statistically significant tensions between different independent cosmological datasets emerged. While these tensions can be in part the result of systematic errors, the persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the need for new physics. In this Letter of Interest we will focus on the 4.4 sigma - tension between the Planck estimate of the Hubble constant H-0 and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the H-0 evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we will list a few interesting models of new physics that could solve this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - The current cosmological probes have provided a fantastic confirmation of the standard A Cold Dark Matter cosmological model, which has been constrained with unprecedented accuracy. However, with the increase of the experimental sensitivity, a few statistically significant tensions between different independent cosmological datasets emerged. While these tensions can be in part the result of systematic errors, the persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the need for new physics. In this Letter of Interest we will focus on the 4.4 sigma - tension between the Planck estimate of the Hubble constant H-0 and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the H-0 evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we will list a few interesting models of new physics that could solve this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
KW - OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS
KW - DARK ENERGY
KW - H-0
KW - CALIBRATION
KW - NEUTRINOS
KW - PLANCK
KW - SAMPLE
KW - CMB
U2 - 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102605
DO - 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102605
M3 - Journal article
VL - 131
JO - Astroparticle Physics
JF - Astroparticle Physics
SN - 0927-6505
M1 - 102605
ER -