Standardization of the strategy for open abdomen in nontrauma emergency laparotomy: A prospective study of outcomes in primary versus temporary abdominal closure

Johanne Gormsen, Dunja Kokotovic, Jakob Burcharth, Thomas Korgaard Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The indications for temporary abdominal closure in nontrauma surgery are heterogeneous and with limited data on clinical outcomes. This study aimed to report the outcomes of primary closure compared with temporary abdominal closure after nontrauma emergency laparotomy within a standardized clinical setting adapted from international guidelines.

METHODS: Included were all nontrauma patients undergoing emergency laparotomy between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, at Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev in Denmark. All patients received treatment on the basis of standardized bundle of care trajectory for major emergency abdominal surgery. Mortality, risks of re-laparotomy, and postoperative complications were assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots and multiple logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS: Of the 576 included patients, temporary abdominal closure was performed in 57 (10%) patients in the initial surgery. Indications for temporary abdominal closure included damage control strategy as the result of considerable hemodynamic instability in 21 (37%) patients, need for reassessment of bowel viability in 21 (37%) patients, and loss of domain in 15 (25%) patients. Fascial closure was achieved after a median period of 2 days. Sixty-seven patients (12%) underwent re-laparotomy, with temporary abdominal closure performed in 10 (15%) of the cases. Patients with temporary abdominal closure had a significantly greater risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 1.38-4.89, P = .003). There were no significant differences in the risks of fascial dehiscence, re-laparotomy, or 30- or 90-days mortality.

CONCLUSION: Temporary abdominal closure was performed in 10% of patients undergoing nontrauma emergency laparotomy, with the primary indications being damage control strategy and need for reassessment of bowel viability. Patients undergoing temporary abdominal closure had a significantly greater risk of postoperative complications.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSurgery
Volume176
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1289-1296
Number of pages8
ISSN0039-6060
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Female
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Laparotomy/methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Aged
  • Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
  • Denmark
  • Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques
  • Emergencies
  • Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Adult
  • Open Abdomen Techniques/methods
  • Abdomen/surgery

Cite this