Abstract
A recent publication in JCBFM, “Static autoregulation in humans” gives rise to critical comments. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow implies that flow is rather constant within a certain blood pressure (BP) range with a lower and an upper pressure limit. The physiology at the two limits is very different, making comparison of the brain’s vulnerability at the limits questionable. The recent publication in JCBFM claims a narrow autoregulatory range based on pooling of data from several studies. However, we argue that such pooling blurs the autoregulatory limits. We summarize the classical literature, therefrom we argue for a broad autoregulatory range.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism |
Number of pages | 3 |
ISSN | 0271-678X |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords
- Autoregulation
- cerebral autoregulation
- cerebral blood flow regulation
- cerebral hemodynamics
- hemodynamics
- meta-analysis