[15O]H2O myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: Added value of relative stress perfusion deficit in the prediction of significant coronary artery stenosis in a mixed population

Peter D. Mark*, Eva Prescott, Lisbeth Marner, Peter Hovind, Martin Krakauer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It remains unknown whether estimation of the relative stress perfusion deficit offers added value in the prediction of significant coronary artery stenosis in myocardial perfusion imaging with [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) in a population with high prevalence of established cardiac disease. Methods: During eight months, we consecutively included all patients undergoing [15O]H2O PET and subsequent invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Significant stenosis was defined from ICA as fractional flow reserve ≤.8 or coronary artery narrowing of ≥70%. We calculated absolute and relative total perfusion deficits (aTPD and rTPD, respectively) as semiquantitative measures of the extent and severity of reduced stress perfusion. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to test the adjusted associations (odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI) with significant coronary artery stenosis. Results: Of 800 patients undergoing [15O]H2O PET, 144 underwent ICA, where 142 patients had aTPD of ≥3% and 79 (55%) of these had at least one significant stenosis. In an adjusted analysis, rTPD (OR10% increase = 2.12 (1.44-3.12), P < .001), previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (OR = .11 (.03-.36), P < .001) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR = .25 (.08-.84), P = .02) were independently associated with significant stenosis, whereas the association with aTPD (OR10% increase = 1.14 (.98-1.32), P = .08) was modest. Conclusions: In the presence of an absolute perfusion deficit (aTPD of ≥3%), rTPD may improve the prediction of significant stenosis in a heterogeneous population of patients examined with [15O]H2O PET. Furthermore, previous CABG and reduced LVEF are associated with nonstenotic perfusion deficiencies, suggesting caution when interpreting myocardial perfusion imaging in such patients.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101880
JournalJournal of Nuclear Cardiology
Volume37
ISSN1071-3581
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Keywords

  • Myocardial perfusion imaging
  • Relative flow reserve
  • Total perfusion deficit
  • [O]HO PET

Cite this