TY - JOUR
T1 - Symptomatic vs. non-symptomatic device-related thrombus after LAAC
T2 - a sub-analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry
AU - Vij, Vivian
AU - Cruz-González, Ignacio
AU - Galea, Roberto
AU - Piayda, Kerstin
AU - Nelles, Dominik
AU - Vogt, Lara
AU - Gloekler, Steffen
AU - Fürholz, Monika
AU - Meier, Bernhard
AU - Räber, Lorenz
AU - O’Hara, Gilles
AU - Arzamendi, Dabit
AU - Agudelo, Victor
AU - Asmarats, Lluis
AU - Freixa, Xavier
AU - Flores-Umanzor, Eduardo
AU - De Backer, Ole
AU - Sondergaard, Lars
AU - Nombela-Franco, Luis
AU - McInerney, Angela
AU - Salinas, Pablo
AU - Korsholm, Kasper
AU - Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens Erik
AU - Afzal, Shazia
AU - Zeus, Tobias
AU - Operhalski, Felix
AU - Schmidt, Boris
AU - Montalescot, Gilles
AU - Guedeney, Paul
AU - Iriart, Xavier
AU - Miton, Noelie
AU - Saw, Jacqueline
AU - Gilhofer, Thomas
AU - Fauchier, Laurent
AU - Veliqi, Egzon
AU - Meincke, Felix
AU - Petri, Nils
AU - Nordbeck, Peter
AU - Gonzalez-Ferreiro, Rocio
AU - Bhatt, Deepak L.
AU - Laricchia, Alessandra
AU - Mangieri, Antonio
AU - Omran, Heyder
AU - Schrickel, Jan Wilko
AU - Rodes-Cabau, Josep
AU - Nickenig, Georg
AU - Sievert, Horst
AU - Sedaghat, Alexander
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is associated with adverse outcomes, i.e. ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Data on predictors of stroke/SE in the context of DRT are limited. Aims: This study aimed to identify predisposing factors for stroke/SE in DRT patients. In addition, the temporal connection of stroke/SE to DRT diagnosis was analyzed. Methods: The EUROC-DRT registry included 176 patients, in whom DRT after LAAC were diagnosed. Patients with symptomatic DRT, defined as stroke/SE in the context of DRT diagnosis, were compared against patients with non-symptomatic DRT. Baseline characteristics, anti-thrombotic regimens, device position, and timing of stroke/SE were compared. Results: Stroke/SE occurred in 25/176 (14.2%) patients diagnosed with DRT (symptomatic DRT). Stroke/SE occurred after a median of 198 days (IQR 37–558) after LAAC. In 45.8% stroke/SE occurred within one month before/after DRT diagnosis (DRT-related stroke). Patients with symptomatic DRT had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (50.0 ± 9.1% vs. 54.2 ± 11.0%, p = 0.03) and higher rates of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (84.0% vs. 64.9%, p = 0.06). Other baseline parameters and device positions were not different. Most ischemic events occurred among patients with single antiplatelet therapy (50%), however, stroke/SE was also observed under dual antiplatelet therapy (25%) or oral anticoagulation (20%). Conclusion: Stroke/SE are documented in 14.2% and occur both in close temporal relation to the DRT finding and chronologically independently therefrom. Identification of risk factors remains cumbersome, putting all DRT patients at substantial risk for stroke/SE. Further studies are necessary to minimize the risk of DRT and ischemic events. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - Background: Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is associated with adverse outcomes, i.e. ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Data on predictors of stroke/SE in the context of DRT are limited. Aims: This study aimed to identify predisposing factors for stroke/SE in DRT patients. In addition, the temporal connection of stroke/SE to DRT diagnosis was analyzed. Methods: The EUROC-DRT registry included 176 patients, in whom DRT after LAAC were diagnosed. Patients with symptomatic DRT, defined as stroke/SE in the context of DRT diagnosis, were compared against patients with non-symptomatic DRT. Baseline characteristics, anti-thrombotic regimens, device position, and timing of stroke/SE were compared. Results: Stroke/SE occurred in 25/176 (14.2%) patients diagnosed with DRT (symptomatic DRT). Stroke/SE occurred after a median of 198 days (IQR 37–558) after LAAC. In 45.8% stroke/SE occurred within one month before/after DRT diagnosis (DRT-related stroke). Patients with symptomatic DRT had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (50.0 ± 9.1% vs. 54.2 ± 11.0%, p = 0.03) and higher rates of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (84.0% vs. 64.9%, p = 0.06). Other baseline parameters and device positions were not different. Most ischemic events occurred among patients with single antiplatelet therapy (50%), however, stroke/SE was also observed under dual antiplatelet therapy (25%) or oral anticoagulation (20%). Conclusion: Stroke/SE are documented in 14.2% and occur both in close temporal relation to the DRT finding and chronologically independently therefrom. Identification of risk factors remains cumbersome, putting all DRT patients at substantial risk for stroke/SE. Further studies are necessary to minimize the risk of DRT and ischemic events. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
KW - Atrial fibrillation
KW - Device-related thrombus
KW - Left atrial appendage closure
KW - Stroke
U2 - 10.1007/s00392-023-02237-w
DO - 10.1007/s00392-023-02237-w
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37294311
AN - SCOPUS:85161413134
VL - 112
SP - 1790
EP - 1799
JO - Clinical Research in Cardiology
JF - Clinical Research in Cardiology
SN - 1861-0684
ER -