Terrorist Threats and Judicial Deference

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The article analyses the extent to which judicial restraint in cases concerning national security is justified. It is argued that the extent of restraint must depend on the normative issue/aspect which is subject to judicial review.
Translated title of the contributionTerrortrusler og domstolstilbageholdenhed
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Long Decade : How 9/11 Changed the Law
EditorsDavid Jenkins, Amanda Jacobsen, Anders Henriksen
Number of pages21
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication date2014
Pages229-249
Chapter13
ISBN (Print)9780199368327
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Faculty of Law

Cite this