TY - JOUR
T1 - The BIAD Standards
T2 - Recommendations for Archaeological Data Publication and Insights From the Big Interdisciplinary Archaeological Database
AU - Reiter, Samantha S.
AU - Staniuk, Robert
AU - Kolář, Jan
AU - Bulatović, Jelena
AU - Rose, Helene Agerskov
AU - Ryabogina, Natalia E.
AU - Speciale, Claudia
AU - Schjerven, Nicoline
AU - Paulsson, Bettina Schulz
AU - Lee, Victor Yan Kin
AU - Canteri, Elisabetta
AU - Revill, Alice
AU - Dahlberg, Fredrik
AU - Sabatini, Serena
AU - Frei, Karin M.
AU - Racimo, Fernando
AU - Ivanova-Bieg, Maria
AU - Traylor, Wolfgang
AU - Kate, Emily J.
AU - Derenne, Eve
AU - Frank, Lea
AU - Woodbridge, Jessie
AU - Fyfe, Ralph
AU - Shennan, Stephen
AU - Kristiansen, Kristian
AU - Thomas, Mark G.
AU - Timpson, Adrian
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This article presents a series of recommendations for the publication of archaeological data, to improve their usability. These 12 recommendations were formulated by archaeological data experts who mined thousands of publications for different data types (including funerary practices, accelerator mass spectrometry dating, stable isotopes, zooarchaeology, archaeobotany and pathologies) during the initial construction of the Big Interdisciplinary Archaeological Database (BIAD). We also include data harmonisation vocabularies utilised for the integration of data from different recording systems. The case studies we cite to illustrate the recommendations are grounded in examples from the published literature and are presented in a problem/solution format. Though practically oriented towards the facilitation of efficient databasing, these recommendations – which we refer to as the BIAD Standards – are broadly applicable by those who want to extract scientific data from archaeological information, those who work with a specific region or theoretical focus and journal editors and manuscript authors. We anticipate that the use of the BIAD Standards will increase the usability, visibility, interoperability and longevity of published data and also increase the citations of those publications from which data were mined. The Standards will also help frame a unified foundation to support the continued integration of the natural sciences with archaeological research in the future.
AB - This article presents a series of recommendations for the publication of archaeological data, to improve their usability. These 12 recommendations were formulated by archaeological data experts who mined thousands of publications for different data types (including funerary practices, accelerator mass spectrometry dating, stable isotopes, zooarchaeology, archaeobotany and pathologies) during the initial construction of the Big Interdisciplinary Archaeological Database (BIAD). We also include data harmonisation vocabularies utilised for the integration of data from different recording systems. The case studies we cite to illustrate the recommendations are grounded in examples from the published literature and are presented in a problem/solution format. Though practically oriented towards the facilitation of efficient databasing, these recommendations – which we refer to as the BIAD Standards – are broadly applicable by those who want to extract scientific data from archaeological information, those who work with a specific region or theoretical focus and journal editors and manuscript authors. We anticipate that the use of the BIAD Standards will increase the usability, visibility, interoperability and longevity of published data and also increase the citations of those publications from which data were mined. The Standards will also help frame a unified foundation to support the continued integration of the natural sciences with archaeological research in the future.
U2 - 10.1515/opar-2024-0015
DO - 10.1515/opar-2024-0015
M3 - Journal article
VL - 10
JO - Open Archaeology
JF - Open Archaeology
SN - 2300-6560
IS - 1
M1 - 20240015
ER -