The Discursive Struggle for Digital Sovereignty: Security, Economy, Rights and the Cloud Project Gaia-X

Rebecca Adler-Nissen*, Kristin Anabel Eggeling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)
241 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores the struggle for ‘digital sovereignty’ in the European Union (EU). A seeming contradiction – the internet, after all, spans the globe – digital sovereignty is portrayed as the winning geoeconomic formula to keep the EU secure, competitive and democratic in the digital future. Approaching digital sovereignty as a discursive claim and analysing it through a case study of the European cloud project Gaia-X, we show that there is no singular understanding of digital sovereignty in the EU. Instead, we identify six different conceptions across the domains of security, economy and rights. This article outlines three scenarios for how the digital sovereignty agenda may develop and thus shape the EU's digital policy and its relations with the rest of the world: constitutional tolerance (where the conceptions co-exist), hegemony (where one conception dominates) or collapse (where the agenda falls apart due to inbuilt conceptual contradictions).

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Common Market Studies
Volume62
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)993-1011
ISSN0021-9886
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies published by University Association for Contemporary European Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Discourse
  • Geopolitcs
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cloud
  • data
  • digital sovereignty
  • rights
  • EU
  • technological
  • strategic autonomy
  • digital single market

Cite this