Abstract
To show why the 1998 doping scandals led to the establishment of the World Anti-Doping Agency, this paper investigates how the IOC has created its organizational identity once confronted with the emergence of doping in sport. The paper endorses a new institutional understanding of organizations, which is combined with a critical discourse analytical framework. Through a systematic reading of the Olympic Review between 1960 and 2003 four main anti-doping discourses are outlined: health scientific, ethical, legal and educational discourses construct the meaning-providing horizon of IOC anti-doping commitment. The 1988 Ben Johnson doping incident is crucial for the understanding of the organizational changes occurring 10 years later. Immediately following the Seoul Olympic Games the IOC applies a warfare genre, which frames anti-doping as a declaration of war and constructs a narrative of the IOC as leading a successful battle against doping. The 1998 doping scandals reveal the opposite. Subsequently, WADA can be labelled IOC's institutionalization failure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Sport Management Review |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 160-173 |
Number of pages | 14 |
ISSN | 1441-3523 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Critical discourse analysis
- Genre
- Metaphors
- New institutionalism
- Warfare
- World Anti-Doping Agency
- WADA